Prosjektledelse nr. 3 2018 | Page 50

MASTEROPPGAVE and work-related well-being not limited to one tries, whereas those working in the ‘Retail/trans­ sector, case or industry. Overall, the study con­ port/hospitality/tourism’ had the highest degrees tributes to research on several levels. Our results of well-being. Furthermore, those working in showed that the degree of project demand, project internal projects indicated a higher degree of control, co-worker support and project comple­ work-related well-being compared to those wor­ xity together explain a rather moderate degree of king in external projects. The male respondents employees’ work-related well-being in the case of showed a higher degree of project demand and project-based work. While the hypotheses consi­ a lower degree of work-related well-being than dering the direct effect of project demand, project the female respondents. Considering the respon­ control and co-worker support were supported, dents years of general work experience as well the hypotheses considering the moderating rela­ as years of experience with project-based work, tionships were not. the degree of work-related well-being seemed to be fairly constant. Finally, an interesting ten­ Hypothesis H 1 : Project demand on work- related well-being (-) Supported/ Rejected between project demand and Supported related well-being (+) H 4 : Moderating effect of co-worker support on the relationship between project demand and work-related well- being (+) H 5 : Co-worker support on work- related well-being (+) H 6 : Moderating effect of project complexity on the relationship between project demand and work-related well-being (-) ject demand seemed to have a low degree of pro­ ject control. In conclusion, and in line with the emerging literature having a critical view on the Rejected impact of project work on employees, our results suggest that project exposure can have a negative impact on employees’ well-being. work-related well-being (+) H 3 : Project control on work- often negatively correlated to the degree of pro­ ject control, i.e. those with a high degree of pro­ H 2 : Moderating effect of project control on the relationship dency was that the degree of project demand was Supported These findings also have implications for practice. It is not only important to explore how project work impact the employees’ well-being, but also how their well-being can be increased. Rejected Over time work characteristics and employees’ well-being mutually influence each other (Bakker & Demerouti, 2014, p. 58). The results in this study suggests that employees’ work-related well-being Supported can be increased by a decrease in the degree of project demand or an increase in the degree of either project control or co-worker support. Rejected REFERENCES: Bakker, A.B. & Demerouti, E. (2014). Job Demands– Resources Theory. In Chen, P. Y., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), Work and wellbeing. Wellbeing: a complete Other interesting findings where that the degree of reference guide, Volume III, pp. 37-64. UK: John work- related well-being differ between the indus­ Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. 50 PROSJEKTLEDELSE • NR. 3 2018