Property Hunter Magazine October Issue 2014 | Page 70

/// Contributor Green-RE From a practical point of view if you need to go from Kuala Lumpur to Seremban you may decide to use at least three different routes which will all bring you to your destination with different times and costs. Green RE is precisely this, a Green index that offers to the construction industry a different way of looking at all the multi-facetted components of a “Green Certification”. Departure point and arrival destination are exactly the same and James has been emphasizing that neither Rehda nor him want to deny the very good work done with the GBI by Pertubuhan Akitek Malaysia (PAM) and the Association of Consulting Engineers Malaysia (ACEM). Dr. Daniele Gambero A basic comparison between GBI (M) and Green RE is showing how stringent are the two Green indexes and the reader may understand how cost-efficiency is not necessarily linked to lower scoring. CEO and co-founder of REI Group of Companies Dr. Daniele Gambero is the CEO of strategic marketing consultancy firm REI Group of Companies. He holds an MBA from L. Bocconi University in Milan-Italy, Master in Communication from the University of Michigan Ann Arbour MI – USA, Ph.D in Marketing Strategies and Communication from L. Bocconi University and University of Michigan. With his vast experience in strategic marketing consultancies, investment studies, researches, property market reports and business valuation globally, the REI Group of Companies helps Malaysian developers with business solutions relating to design, concept, strategic marketing and pricing, advertising and marketing and sale procedures for their residential, commercial and industrial projects since 2007. Dr. Gambero’s lectures attract large crowds due to his lively presentation of serious topics with deep insight into the Malaysian Property market since 2011. While the author makes reasonable efforts to present information which he believes to be reliable, the author makes no representation that the information or opinions contained in this article is accurate and complete. Readers are advised to seek specific professional advice before acting on the views. 70 www.PropertyHunter.com.my AWARD CLASSIFICATION COMPARISON BETWEEN GBI & GREEN RE % 0-49% GBI NO GREEN RE 50% 55% 60% NO BCA GREEN MARK AWARD TYPE 65% CERTIFIED 66% 70% 75% SILVER BRONZE 76% 80% 85% 86% 90% GOLD 91% 95% 100% PLATINUM SILVER GOLD PLATINUM GREEN PREMIUM COST % OF TCC “Walking The Green Talk” Green-RE Executive Director always likes to bring up, to clarify this concept, how the different approach of Green RE on some of the features prescribed by GBI allows a more economic yet Platinum 2% to 8% practical and effective impact for the services offered to the residents. GBI award 1 point if the developer is constructing within the project a BUS Stop area even though no busses are actually Gold Plus 1% to 3% passing by that area. In a multiple layer society as Malaysia is with the commixture of so different Gold Plus 1% to 2% cultures and habits, the need for a flexible Green tool is a must and for James, GBI can be classified Certified 0.3% to 1% as quite rigid. One of the key points that Rehda has kept in mind while designing the Green-RE is TCC = Total Construction Cost the effective impact of all the different components or, in other words, how to make the offer of Green-RE certified building more attractive for the purchasers. It is a fact that Green is costing and the Singapore experience is giving a rough idea of how much going green is actually impacting the cost/selling value of properties. The table below gives a good idea in term of numbers and is based on more than 350 certification done by Green Mark between 2005 and 2008. Green Mark Sg – Green Building Index (M) Why Going Green? How Malaysian developers are moving towards the Green and Eco-friendly concept Almost 10 years ago and after deep analysis and studies on similar systems in other countries around the world, our neighbor Singapore introduced the Green Mark for their construction industry. A man with a deep experience in “Green cost efficiency” and actual benefit evaluation of the different categories of “green action/ credits”, has been engaged with Rehda (Real Estate Housing Developer Association) as Green consultant for their new Head Quarter in PJ. Wisma Rehda’s construction was initiated in 2009, with occupation in early 2012. In early 2009, Malaysia was preparing the inception of its own GBI (Green Building Index) as a profession driven initiative to lead the property industry towards more environment-friendly buildings. Rehda, which is representing the largest part of this industry, responsibly decided to have Wisma Rehda designed and constructed as a Green Building to set an example to achieve the GBI certification as it did. During the construction of their new Head Quarter Rehda intent to implement Leed as their based greentool (Leed is the US Green Index) but decided not to, partially overlooking on all the practical differences between equatorial climate Countries, as Malaysia is, and the four seasons ones as US is. Cultural and life-styles habits should also have been looked at and considered when defining categories of action and related scorings. Another weakness is the fact that our local tool has not been implemented as a costeffective and efficient tool and has not been undergoing periodic updates which, considering the high moving speed of the Green industry and related technologies should be looked at on a minimal yearly basis. Concerned with the rising of an overall construction related costs and consequently of the selling values of residential properties, where the public was and is asking for more affordable per square feet prices, Rehda decided to champion and propose possible amendments and improvements to the newly launched GBI (M). While analyzing the GBI and by comparing it to the Green Mark, the development industry realized that a Green Building Index System purposely designed for the Malaysian climate and the South East Asian culture, instead of adopting one designed for a Country, as US is, where the temperature differential during the 12 months goes from -20 Co up to 35 Co. There is not a day in which newspaper are not talking about quality of air, pollution of rivers, CO2 emissions and so on. Going Green is a MUST for responsible citizens and, hopefully in construction, will be implemented as compulsory by the Authorities soon. As a matter of fact in Singapore a developer must make sure that their project will at least score a Green Mark certification before applying for a construction permit. The alternative is simply having the permit application directly and New Residential New Non-Resdential Existing Non-Resdential instantaneously rejected. CATEGORY Building Maximum Building Maximum Building Maximum Energy Efficiency 83 99 89 Water Efficiency 16 14 24 Enviromental Protection 40 32 39 Indoor Enviromental Quality 6 8 18 Other Green Features 7 7 10 Carbon Emmision of Development 4 TOTAL CREDITS OBTAINABLE 156 BCA GREEN MARK AWARD TYPE GREEN PREMIUM PAYBACK PERIOD Platinum 2 to 8 years Gold Plus 2 to 6 years Gold Plus 2 to 6 years Certified 2 to 5 years 4 4 The citizens and businesses or end users of the “development project” should be the ones requesting it but here in Malaysia we still do not have a clear idea of cost/pay-back period/profit that going Green Building will generate for our pocket. The whole Green Building scenario will look more promising if we can estimate how long it may take to recover the inevitably higher cost of buying a green house or office and which are the areas where to request a stronger green performance. The higher is the impact of credits the better at the end will be the relief on the purchasers’ wallet and the payback period might not be as long as expected as both electricity and water costs are on a continuous rise. Buyers for own use will enjoy after a reasonable lap of time less expensive bills while investors will be able to justify higher rentals based on user-friendly electricity and water bill offered by a Green Building living. 164 184 www.PropertyHunter.com.my 71