Project Management: Lessons from Delaware and Tennessee | Page 2
The First Hundred Days
Long-Term
Oversight
One of the key ways both Delaware and Tennessee have built their long-term implementation
capacity is by setting up oversight mechanisms
to monitor long-term RTTT implementation.
Specifically, both Delaware and Tennessee
have created performance management functions within their state education agencies.
In addition, Tennessee has created an external oversight mechanism composed of key
stakeholders.
In Delaware, long-term RTTT oversight is
being led by a new Project Management Office
(PMO) housed within the DDOE. Within the
PMO, a Performance Management Team is
being created to track performance data, alert
the Secretary when performance is off track,
and lead problem solving sessions with key
DDOE personnel to identify ways to get performance back on track when necessary. The
state is also working with the U.S. Education
Delivery Institute, a national education nonprofit founded by Sir Michael Barber, to assist
the Performance Management Team in developing its oversight and monitoring processes.
In Tennessee, the state has established
two primary internal performance management functions. First, TDOE reestablished a
Both Delaware and Tennessee
have created performance
management functions within
their state education agencies.
In addition, Tennessee has
created an external oversight
mechanism composed of key
stakeholders.
Project Management Oversight Committee
(PMOC), which had previously existed within
TDOE to manage complex projects. The PMOC
is responsible for launching and monitoring the
deliverables of each individual RTTT project as
well as ensuring connections are made across
projects. The PMOC includes members from
the Governor’s Office, TDOE, and the Tennessee Higher Education Commission, which is
responsible for overseeing approximately $20
million of RTTT projects. In addition to the
PMOC, Tennessee has established an Education Delivery Unit (EDU) within TDOE to monitor
the long-term progress of RTTT implementation, specifically the extent to which RTTT is
SCORE
August 2010
achieving the state’s student achievement
goals. Like Delaware’s Performance Management Team, EDU staff will work with the U.S.
Education Delivery Institute to develop systems
for monitoring performance data and working
with the Commissioner of Education to intervene when performance is off track.
In addition to these performance management functions within TDOE, Tennessee has
established an external oversight mechanism,
the First to the Top Advisory Council. The Advisory Council is composed of 14 key education
leaders from across the state including four
elected or appointed officials, six foundation or
business representatives, and four educators.
The Governor-appointed Council meets every
six to ten weeks and is tasked with monitoring
RTTT implementation. Since the state will be
undergoing a gubernatorial transition in November 2010, the hope is that the Council will serve
as a mechanism for ensuring RTTT implementation is continued smoothly across gubernatorial
administrations.
State Capacity
In addition to establishing oversight mechanisms, both Delaware and Tennessee have
begun adding staff to create long-term implementation capacity within the state. As of early
August 2010, both states had filled approximately half of the positions they were hoping
to fill, with Delaware having filled most of their
senior level positions and Tennessee having
filled most of their mid-level positions. While
both states were aiming to hire a mix of both
in-state and out-of-state candidates, Tennessee has primarily hired in-state candidates to
date while Delaware has hired a mix of in-state
and out-of-state candidates. In addition to hiring new personnel, both states were working to
restructure their SEAs, with the restructuring
in Tennessee being much more significant than
the restructuring in Delaware.
In Delaware, all of the state’s new hires
will work within DDOE’s new PMO. The PMO
is composed of three units: (1) the Teacher
and Leader Effectiveness Unit (TLEU), which
will lead the state’s teacher and leader effectiveness initiatives (2) the School Turnaround
Unit (STU), which will lead the state’s efforts
to turnaround low-performing schools and (3)
the previously mentioned Performance Management Unit, which will focus on monitoring RTTT
implementation. DDOE has had a very aggressive national recruiting effort to identify leaders
of the PMU, TLEU, and STU. To date, Delaware
2
has hired Jim Palmer, a former Bank of America
executive, to lead the PMU; Pete Schulman,
the former leader of Miami-Dade County Public
Both Delaware and Tennessee
are partnering with a select
group of state and national
partners to provide technical
assistance in areas where the
state lacks either capacity or
expertise.
Schools’ teacher effectiveness efforts, to lead
the TLEU; and Noreen LaSorsa, a former high
school principal in Delaware’s Christina School
District, to run the STU. Prior to Delaware’s
RTTT application, Secretary Lowery reorganized
DDOE to streamline the agency’s workflow and
focus on the SEA’s top priorities. This restructuring was well aligned with Delaware’s RTTT
plan and, when combined with the formation of
the PMO, provides a strong organizational structure for RTTT implementation.
Tennessee is also hiring new staff to build
the state’s long-term implementation capacity.
However, unlike in Delaware, Tennessee is hiring staff in several different state agencies, not
just the state education agency. For example,
the Governor’s office has hired a former policy
analyst at Vanderbilt’s National Center for Performance Incentives to run the state’s teacher
evaluation efforts; the Tennessee Higher Education Commission has hired a former analyst
from the non-profit SCORE to lead the design
of the state’s new teacher preparation program
report card; and TDOE has hired Cory Curl, the
Governor’s former education policy advisor, to
run the Education Delivery Un