Professional Identity Magazine – Sarah Perkins | Page 24
3.2 - Feedback & Reflection
Communication: Professional Practice and Communication: Professional Identity
Mock Interview FORMATIVE Feedback
Name of Student: �FeP;M1NS
Interviewed by: �Df,-et,J fit:l/() -
�oe �wrJ
Marking Criteria
How well was the
Portfolio designed and
edited?
How well did the
Portfolio communica
knowledge, skills an
Was the student able
.to discuss ancl explain
projects and converse
generally?
Did the student present
in a professi_pnal
manner, ie. eye
contact, dress,
nonverbal
communication?
Was the letter and th
CV well designed and
the content
appropriate?
70%+ Distinction
(Indicate if 80+)
�ce.
and clarity; engagin
conversation and
positive response t
feedback.
,ry professional
manner;· made eye
contact, friendly and
open in conversation.
, ., ,formativ
accurate.
60-69% High Pass
Confidence and clarity;
engaging conversation
and generally good
response to feedback ..
Professional, able to
make eye contact, and
positive in 'conversation.
'ell designed and the
content was clear,
informative and
accurate.
50-59% Pass
Generally well designed
and edited.
40-49% Low Pass
General improvement
required.
Generally well Basic level of
inconsistencies in identi_ty. design identity.
,Good conversation with
ome confidence;,
lenerally acknowledged
feedback.
Presented well, able to
make eye contact,
engaged in conversation.
'easonably well
d�igned; content was
cl�r and informative;
have been some
A little hesitant in
conversation; not
always clear I
consistent, limited
response to feedback;
Further preparation is
recommended.
Presented in an
acceptable manner; a
little reserved.
The student should aim
to improve dress.
Lacked a well resolved
graphic design strategy
and content may have
been a little confused
and inaccurate.
The CV communic�ted
the student's desig
identity, knowledge a\d
skills.
The CV commynicated
the student's design
identity, knowledge an
·
skills.
,!.he·CV communicated
the student's knowledge
and skills.
The CV made
reference to the
student's knowledge
and skills.
UNIVERSITYoF
PORTSMOUTH
0-39% Fail
Not sufficiently
designed.
Limited communication.
No succinct identity.
Very hesitant and
struggled to engage in
conversation;
Preparation and
rehearsal is
recommended.
Did not present in an
appropriate manner and
dress was not
appropriate for an
interview.
Lacked a graphic design
strategy and content
may have been
inappropriate.
There may have been
significant inaccuracies.
clear design identi
communicated, some communication and
19