Professional Identity Magazine – Sarah Perkins | Page 24

3.2 - Feedback & Reflection Communication: Professional Practice and Communication: Professional Identity Mock Interview FORMATIVE Feedback Name of Student: �FeP;M1NS Interviewed by: �Df,-et,J fit:l/() - �oe �wrJ Marking Criteria How well was the Portfolio designed and edited? How well did the Portfolio communica knowledge, skills an Was the student able .to discuss ancl explain projects and converse generally? Did the student present in a professi_pnal manner, ie. eye contact, dress, nonverbal communication? Was the letter and th CV well designed and the content appropriate? 70%+ Distinction (Indicate if 80+) �ce. and clarity; engagin conversation and positive response t feedback. ,ry professional manner;· made eye contact, friendly and open in conversation. , ., ,formativ accurate. 60-69% High Pass Confidence and clarity; engaging conversation and generally good response to feedback .. Professional, able to make eye contact, and positive in 'conversation. 'ell designed and the content was clear, informative and accurate. 50-59% Pass Generally well designed and edited. 40-49% Low Pass General improvement required. Generally well Basic level of inconsistencies in identi_ty. design identity. ,Good conversation with ome confidence;, lenerally acknowledged feedback. Presented well, able to make eye contact, engaged in conversation. 'easonably well d�igned; content was cl�r and informative; have been some A little hesitant in conversation; not always clear I consistent, limited response to feedback; Further preparation is recommended. Presented in an acceptable manner; a little reserved. The student should aim to improve dress. Lacked a well resolved graphic design strategy and content may have been a little confused and inaccurate. The CV communic�ted the student's desig identity, knowledge a\d skills. The CV commynicated the student's design identity, knowledge an · skills. ,!.he·CV communicated the student's knowledge and skills. The CV made reference to the student's knowledge and skills. UNIVERSITYoF PORTSMOUTH 0-39% Fail Not sufficiently designed. Limited communication. No succinct identity. Very hesitant and struggled to engage in conversation; Preparation and rehearsal is recommended. Did not present in an appropriate manner and dress was not appropriate for an interview. Lacked a graphic design strategy and content may have been inappropriate. There may have been significant inaccuracies. clear design identi communicated, some communication and 19