Pro Installer July 2018 - Issue 64 | Page 10

10 | JULY 2018 News Read online at www.proinstaller.co.uk GRENFELL – AT WHO’S DOOR SHOULD WE LAY THE BLAME? On the 14th June 2017 a fire broke out in the Grenfell Tower which soon turned into a raging inferno killing 72 of the occupants. The fire burned for a total of 60 hours before finally being extinguished by fire fighters. Once extinguished, the tower block was uninhabitable, experts believed the building may collapse so residents from houses near by were evacuated and the local secondary school was closed and hasn’t been open since. On the 15th June 2017, Prime Minister Theresa May ordered a public inquiry to determine the facts sur- rounding the tragedy, Sir Martin Moore-Bick was appointed to lead the public inquiry into the fire on June 27th, he stated at the time that the investigation would be “open, transparent and fair.” BBC’s Panorama recently investigated Insulation man- ufacturer Celotex, who pro- duced the RS500 insulation used on the Grenfell Tower, along with hundreds of oth- er buildings around the UK. Marketing material produced by the company suggest- ed that the insulation was suitable for use with other cladding material, which as the investigation discovered is not the case. Panorama has alleged that Celotex used a higher quantity of fire retardant in RS 5000 when it was put forward for its fire test certification than in the final version of the product when it went on sale. It was this fact they allege which made the insulation highly flammable especially when combined with combustible panels. The BBC programme also allege that Celotex targeted contractors refurbishing Grenfell and sold them flammable RS 5000 insula- tion, knowing it would be combined with combustible panels, making it a highly dangerous combination. Residents and members of the public have called for a ban on combustible cladding, but Hackitt in her report stated that it wasn’t her responsibility to suggest a ban, but she did say that the government could implement a ban. Housing Secretary, James Brokenshire said he would consult on a possible ban of combustible cladding. Housing Minister, Domi- nic Rabb whilst on BBC’s Question Time programme, said he was committed to a ban combustible cladding, but as yet the government hasn’t announced a ban. Though recently the Housing Minister for Wales, Rebecca Evans has an- nounced a ban on the type of cladding used on Gren- fell in Wales. She also said, “The Welsh government would make the radical and far reaching reforms to the regulatory system”. The Royal Institute of Building Architects are one of the national organisa- tions who are also calling for a ban on inflammable cladding. Some believe that com- panies may be resistance towards a ban which is part of a multi-million-pound industry and would affect most installations of rain screen cladding. There are approximately 300 tow- er blocks across the UK that are currently affected. Though there is growing cross party support for a ban, but the government in its wisdom has decided that its not the right time to place a ban on those prod- ucts affected. Another problem that has been highlighted by the in- vestigation by Dame Judith Hackitt was the system of building inspectors, which is becoming dominated by private inspectors. The num- ber of private inspectors has grown considerably since 1985 when the then PM Margret Thatcher privatised the profession in order to speed up the process. Now we’re in a situation where companies are offering de- sign and inspection services under one roof, that they are no longer independent from each other. They may even work in the same office within the company. Where there may be a con- flict of interest. Dame Hack- itt described the process as a ‘Race to the Bottom’. In the last 10 years de- regulation has continued at a rapid pace, proposals to give building inspec- tors more power has been ignored by a number of governments since the pro- fession was privatised. This was done because govern- ments wanted a ‘light touch’ approach. Judith Hackett described the regulatory system was not fit for pur- pose and confirmed there were deep flaws in the cur- rent system, leaving it open for those wanting to take short cuts. She also stated in her report that one of the key issues was indifference, ‘The primary motivation is to do things as quickly and cheaply as possible rath- er than to deliver quality homes which are safe for people to live in’. Dame Hackitt has sug- gested in her report that a new more powerful and independent national body be set up. The national body would approve safety in buildings at the design stage of construction. They would then carry out regular checks during the rest of the construc- tion phase. Having more power would allow them to punish offenders regardless whether they are designers, developers, directors and builders when a project goes wrong. In the aftermath of Gren- fell, the Association of Brit- ish Insurers commissioned a report in to fire safety, tests were carried out by the Fire Protection Associa- tion (FPA). They discovered that current fire safety tests were not fit for purpose.