Pro Installer August 2020 - Issue 89 | Page 18

18 | AUGUST 2020 News Read online at www.proinstaller.co.uk A WINDOW INTO THE TINY HOUSE MOVEMENT There is no doubt that the UK faces a housing crisis. But, at the same time, we are also confronted with an environmental crisis and one of homelessness. Here, Nick Cowley, managing director of PVCu windows and doors manufacturer Euramax, explains how the Tiny Homes Movement could be part of the response to all three problems. Surely, solving the housing and homelessness crises is simple? We just build more homes. And the construction industry’s answer to the climate crisis is simple as well; we just build fewer homes. Of course, it is not that simple, and it still would not be if those two solutions were not diametrically opposed. Building more homes comes with problems of its own; planning permission, local opposition to building projects and the shortage of affordable and available land. There are also the skills and materials shortages to consider, as well as the relative lack of small builders in the UK, compared to fifteen years ago before the financial crisis of the late noughties and the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, we must address the fundamental economics of housebuilding; it has to represent a worthwhile business model and, if you build and release for sale a lot of houses at once, the value of each one decreases, making the project less economically sustainable. Tiny houses: UK viable? The Tiny Homes Movement has existed for some time, with early estimates dating it as far back as 1997, when the British born, and American based architect Sarah Susanka published her book The Not So Big House. In it, she argues that cosy, intimate, warm and, crucially, small spaces can be more pleasant to live in than expansive, spacious, and rambling ones. There is a very clear and strong argument here, which could help create a counter thesis to the idea that it’s not possible to solve the housing shortage and homelessness issues while also creating a cleaner, more environmentally viable construction industry. Tiny houses are easy to build and, while they are currently the domain of highly specialist eco-builders, they could use modular, mass manufacturing techniques to deliver sustainable homes at a very low price. They are also simple to plan and deliver, easy to move if there is a change in geographical requirement and use less energy to manufacture, build, maintain and live in than contemporary affordable housing. It’s a win-win, right? ‘ High specification does not have to add to building cost because the entire window unit can be built off site ’ Tiny changes, big results There is one potential catch. It is essential that tiny homes are presented as exactly that; they cannot simply be an excuse to make affordable homes on existing plots untenably small. In 2019, the Government proposed mandatory design regulations on storage space to help counter this problem. Speaking at the Chartered Institute of Housing’s conference, Theresa May, the former Prime Minister, said, “I cannot accept a system in which owners and tenants are forced to accept tiny homes with inadequate storage. “Where developers feel the need to fill show homes with deceptively small furniture and where the lack of universal standards encourages a race to the bottom.” Her concerns are valid, and the proposed regulations have been welcomed by most of the property developers, architects, and home builders that I work with at Euramax. Furthermore, they have not dimmed the nascent sense of excitement around the tiny homes movement’s problem-solving potential.