Popular Culture Review Vol. 5, No. 1, February 1994 | Page 9

Hypervisual Standard Popular Culture view, when the English, for example, would have immediately fixed the bell so that it might sound. Thus we discover that it is no accident that New York Harbor features the newly refurbished Miss Hypervisual Liberty, with torch held high, in greeting to all our visitors and immigrants, rather than offering some traditionally chiming and temporal Big Ben. For the same revolutionary reason, we know it is no accident that the Englishman is caricatur^ by "Oh, 1 SAY, old chap"; whereas the American, from Casablanca to Tango and Cash characteristically remarks, "See ya', kid" or "Here’s looking at you, kid." We thus escape the accident of believing that, like the Oxford professor, our dissertation director wants scholarship, research and brilliant thinking, when in reality his greatest approbation comes in the encomium, "This really LOOKS GOOD!" Emerson simply put the irrevocable New-World nosethumbing thus in a popular bon mot: "Eyes wait for no introduction; they are no Englishman" (Home Book 597). It is no accident, then, that our national anthems exult in "the dawn's early light" or in the ocular sortie of "Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory"; or that our national seal sports an "eagle-eyed" American Eagle of 6X vision and, obversely, a "mystic eye" upon a pyramid; or that our best-known poem begins in unforgettably anti-verbal fashion, "I think that I shall never s e e / A poem lovely as a tree"; or that Benjamin Franklin was quick to "improvt the street lamps of Philadelphia" so that, via open panes, they might outshine the "poorly illuminated streets of London" (1:135) or that, like Emerson’s famous "transparent eyeball," he conjoined the macro- and nucroscopic lenses into bifocals so that he might "see all"; or that Thomas Edison was so obsessed with finding just the right filament for his electric light-bulb; or that American scientists demand the most powerful telescopes in the world in order to produce the most detailed pictures yet of the Milky Way; or that even our telephone companies stress the superiority of "fiber-optic" cables or the visual screening of numbers before you answer any call. Indeed, it is not necessary or technically productive for General Motors, for example, to offer their customers sixteen different shades of "blue" on their Oldsmobiles, or for the American supermarket or mega-mart to attempt to overwhelm the shopper with barrages of competing colors—Crest’s blues against Colgate’s reds and whites—but this apparent excess of eye-options obviously comforts and assures the