Popular Culture Review Vol. 26, No. 1, Winter 2015 | Page 82

offered the liberation of all those who were oppressed (Berger 5). It offered an escape from social expectations. If someone were gay, religious, feminist, etc. they were accepted (e.g. Queercore, Christian Punk, Riot Grrrl respectively). Punk was inherently created to give a voice to the minority. “Bloody Revolutions”: Where Does Punk Come From? Punk emerged out of an amalgamation of a whole host of prior resistance movements but it specifically arose out of a rejection of Glam Rock (see Hebdige). Glam Rock focused its energy on flamboyant clothing and expressed ideas of youth angst. It was meant to break away from the collectivism of most other subcultures. Instead, members strived to individuate themselves while pursuing hedonistic ideals. It abandoned political topics to focus on escapism. Coincidently, Glam Rock became hugely popular and began to popularize the concept of subculture and social deviance. Punk twisted the Glam Rock escapist identity and combined it with Skinhead aggressive politics. Both styles were combined to exhibit a combat-like uniform that was also flamboyant and offensive to look at (e.g., tattered clothes, combat boots, long spiked hair, safety pin jewelry). As Punk grew, it splintered into a whole host of other sub-genres like Garage Punk, Straightedge, Hardcore, etc. (Turrini and Joseph 59). Each of these sub-genres of Punk created their own styles of music, fashion, and ideology while still remaining under the Punk umbrella. In the late 80s and 90s, Punk became widely popular for mainstream audiences with self-proclaimed Punk bands like Green Day and Blink 182 (Matula 21). However, these bands tweaked the sound to be more appealing to larger audiences. They “used bratty vocals and loud, compressed guitar sounds rather than the loudly mixed vocals, with guitar and bass playing that employed distinctive ‘figures’ [of traditional Punk]” (Turrini and Joseph 59). Slowly, Punk was twisted beyond recognition and gave rise to more self-oriented cultures like Grunge and Goth (Clark 2). After Punk, there was a change in the pattern of youth subcultural thinking. Punk represented the final stage of subcultures and counter cultures (Clark 2-3). Punk groups stood outside of dominant cultures. Every group before Punk had an idealistic purpose to challenge normative behavior. They resisted hegemonic culture. Post-Punk cultures could be more accurately termed co-cultures. They functioned in 78