Popular Culture Review Vol. 25, No. 1, Winter 2014 | Page 23

The 1988 Show 19 played simultaneously but rather as a chord. Even when one note is a bit louder than the others, it is the chord that we hear. And so what is lost when the MP3 algorithm gets rid of what it considers extraneous simultaneous sound? A lot of music is lost. And somehow, we have all tacitly agreed to this, agreed that it is change that we accept. It is the sort of agreement, however, that is not really active, because once we agreed to the technology we also agreed to the change in values. And this is because all technologies, and all tools, are conveyers of values. They force us to take up their values the moment we adopt them for use. The general misconception that tools and technology are “value neutral” is, in fact, one of the most dangerous beliefs in culture today. It not only blinds us to the reality around us but also shifts the moral debate that should be taking place. Rather than focusing on how we should be using a certain piece of technology, we should, instead, be asking whether we want that technology to begin with and thus whether we want to accept the values it ushers into our lives and our culture. This is true of all technology and all tools. They necessarily carry values with them and we adopt those values when we use the tool. Email is not at all best understood as “just like regular mail, but faster.” It is a totally different form of communication. A cell phone is not “just like a regular phone, but now it’s mobile.” Rather, a cell phone changes everything about how we communicate, how we think of ourselves, our family, our jobs, etc. And so an iPod is not just like a record player, but now it’s portable. It changes everything about how we listen to music, how we conceptualize music, and how we define our own identities. The truth of the matter is that the overwhelming majority of technological change over the last twenty-five years has brought us tools that have built-in values that are bad values for us. They are values that separate us and disempower us—and it is part of their evil, in fact, that while they are doing this they lie to us and tell us that they are bringing us together and democratizing power for us. The values that inhabit most media tools today are the values of corporations not people, oligarchs not communities, and capitalists not humanists—and although the built-in values are impossible to overcome once we use the tools, it is not necessary that we accept the tools themselves in the first place. Change is inevitable. But it is immoral for us to believe that a particular technological trajectory of change is inevitable and we must just sit back and go along for the ride—that somehow the force of history demands we must be on Facebook, must have a cell phone, and must text and Tweet and Instagram every moment of our lives.