Popular Culture Review Vol. 23, No. 2, Summer 2012 | Page 83

Gag Order: Muting, Mortification, and Motherhood in Eminem’s “Cleaning Out My Closet” Most children, it seems safe to say, will at some point in life be embarrassed by their parents, whether with baby pictures, unflattering anecdotes, or merely their well-intended presence at a social function. Few, however, strike back with a virulence like that of the rapper in Marshall “Eminem” Mathers’s apostrophic song “Cleaning Out My Closet” (The Eminem Show, 2002). In The Pursuit o f Signs, Jonathan Culler writes of apostrophes— direct second-person address—in lyric poetry that “above all they are embarrassing: embarrassing to me and to you” as “images of invested passion” (135-138) and may be employed by a poet “to give the dead or inanimate a voice and make them speak” (153). In “Apostrophe, Animation, and Abortion,” Barbara Johnson writes that as the “direct address of an absent, dead, or inanimate being by a first-person speaker,” apostrophe ventriloquistically “throws voice, life, and human form into the address ee.” She reads apostrophic poems by Baudelaire and Shelley as self-reflexive contemplations on the possibility of animation through rhetoric; in them, apostrophe becomes “not just the poem’s mode but also the poem’s theme.” Following this notion of the literalization of “language’s capacity to give life” into poems about abortion, in which speakers use direct address to animate and give voice to aborted children, Johnson asserts that the life-giving act of address creates a state of suspended animation in which the children can stay “alive” indefinitely. In a rather more vitriolic—though no less passionate—tone than most of the poems Culler and Johnson examine, “Cleaning Out My Closet” takes their ideas about apostrophe in alternate affective directions; namely, through its angry, forestalling mode of address, it humiliates instead of embarrassing, it silences while purporting to give voice, and it turns animation into a cadaverous stasis. Instead of hyperbolically ventriloquizing dead or inanimate objects, this malevolent incarnation of apostrophe humiliates by taking away the voice of the living. The title “Cleaning Out My Closet” both privileges the rapper’s own voice over anyone else’s and implies some kind of revelation, some exposure and exposition of sordid secrets and sins, and the rapper’s diction reveals his desire to make that display as loudly public as possible. He repeatedly positions himself at the forefront of crowd scenes, being “protested and demonstrated against,” causing “all this commotion,” and describing his life as “the Eminem Show.” And if it is a show, he makes it a spectacular courtroom drama in which little order is to be found. Indeed, this drama is hardly fictional; Deborah Mathers filed a lawsuit against her son in 1999, seeking ten million dollars in damages for slander (the suit was settled for $25,000, of which all but $1,600 went to her lawyers) (Moss 2001).