Popular Culture Review Vol. 23, No. 1, Winter 2012 | Page 80

76 Popular Culture Review Psychology. This paucity seems clear testimony to the perceived Eurocentric orientation of the field. The popular biography of the spiritual founder of Buddhism is well known, presumably too well known to belabor here. As the folk biography relates the narrative, after almost starving himself to death he collapsed in a stream while bathing. During his search for enlightenment, Siddhartha identified meditation as proper. Motivation for meditation in traditional Buddhist practice is to achieve insight, not necessarily create physiological change. Nor, for that matter is meditation seen as a therapeutic intervention. Meditative practice is said to deal with the 5 hindrances—agitation, aversion, craving, doubt, and sloth. Still, Buddhism, as is perhaps typical of such social structures, exists in an array of varietal forms, Zen being especially common in Japan. It may be intuitive that people anywhere searching for “happiness” would in due course investigate Eastern philosophy. Although there is no immediately apparent explanation for why the Zen form of Buddhism was one of the varieties well introduced into the US, it is possible to speculate on mechanisms such as the Arts & Craft movement, which provided such an impulse toward cultural exchange, or the effects of the occupation of the Japanese archipelago in the late forties and early fifties. In keeping with the normal exploratory nature of human curiosity, much New Age activity loosely bound to Happiness Studies is patent balderdash, with easily enumerated suspicions and “problems” plaguing the enterprise, such as: • One finds during a careful literature survey by topic in Positive Psychology that much, perhaps too much, of the research on happiness is based on self-report questionnaires. Unless this has not been mentioned in the methods discussion, there is little or none of the traditional test-test-retest imposed by independent inquiry into random samples of these pools of responses. • A good portion of Positive Psychology is uncomfortably frequently extrapolated from correlation rather than experimental data. Because the subject pool is comprised of human beings, it is often difficult and on occasion illegal to construct experimental protocols to “get around” this. Still, although this is a realistic explanation for the lack of some purely experimental data, it does not “raise” the desired confidence level afforded by the existing data pack. Poor data does not become good because better data is not available. • Positive Psychology is at this point necessarily based on short term rather than longitudinal research. Time will tell. Perhaps some longitudinal evidence will enter the research flow.