Popular Culture Review Vol. 20, No. 1, Winter 2009 | Page 40

36 Popular Culture Review those norms (Bordo). Related to this concept, the disciplined body invokes the idea of control—both over one’s (female) body and over the (female) gender as a whole. Disciplinary practices, such as dieting and exercise, comprise the process by which the ideal feminine body is constructed (Bartky). Hegemonic femininity, those widely held and unquestioningly accepted notions of what feminine means, today “has a strong emphasis on appearance with the dominant notion of an ideal feminine body as thin and toned” (Krane, Baird, Aimar, and Kauer 316). Women’s bodies are scrutinized by the self and others (Hall and Hebert; Lockford), and even more so when taking on the role of bride. The bride’s disciplined body, noted Boden, is defined, indeed, literally shaped, through control, denial, and anticipation—and stands in contrast to the abundance of choice and sumptuousness, appearing in the form of food, of the wedding occasion. As purveyors of ultimate femininity, bridal media “promote the disciplined female body—disciplined not only through diet, beauty, regimes, costume, gesture, and posture. . . but also through confor ming to the more traditional properties of wedding etiquette and formality” (Boden 65). Wedding etiquette dictates the proper packaging: the white wedding gown. The bridal gown further dictates the body within—brides should not be heavy or “plus-size,” as Patterson noted in her essay on bridal ads. While clothes usually cover and conceal the body, especially the overweight body (Lockford), the wedding gown’s construction (form fitting, heavy material, white color) disallows any concealment. Akin to W olfs metaphor of the beauty myth as “Iron Maiden” (17), the bridal gown, perpetuated in bridal advertisements and media as the only acceptable wedding costume for women, creates a similar three-dimensional mold into which women are “trapped” or, more conectly, trap themselves. Berger’s assertion that “men act and women appear” becomes even more relevant in the context of the wedding as social and mediated event (98). Rarely, if ever, does this star status accompany the images of the bridegroom in wedding media, which further underscores the visual importance of the female within the world of weddings—and in wider society. In this manner, the surveyed female turns herself “into an object,” a “sight”: “Her own sense of being in herself is supplanted by a sense of being appreciated as herself by another” (97). Not only does the bridal appearance demand the gaze of others, but the emphasis on attaining the perfect everything—body, hair, makeup, dress—also demands the bride’s own gaze. The spectacle of weight loss and bridal appearance is what Buff Brides offers its viewers, as well as the women featured in the program itself in the form of self-gaze. Thus, as a cultural performance of femininity, the gaze originates in the bride herself, wedding guests, viewers of the show, and, especially, her husband-to-be. After all, notes Berger, the success of a woman’s life is how she appears to men. In this sense, Buff Brides serves as an example of