Popular Culture Review Vol. 19, No. 2, Summer 2008 | Page 45

The (Not So) Good Old Days 41 attempted to address an issue. But because the discussion was for and most often by white people, the analysis never went very deep. A 1987 Donahue episode on white supremacist home-schooling perfectly illustrates the trends I’ve outlined above, and in its treatment of racism, it is typical of most other old-style talk shows that I observed. It focuses on parents who have removed their children from public schools that either celebrate Martin Luther King’s birthday, or teach black history. The panel is comprised of Stephanie, a young KKK mother and her daughter, a white couple and their daughter, J.D. Alder (a Grand Dragon of the Klan), Johnny Lee Clary (a former Klansman), and Rev. Wade Watts (former president of the NAACP and the only person of color on stage.) One of the most distinct elements of the episode’s dynamic is the way it attempts to contain racism within the panel of guests. Repeatedly, Donahue and audience members project racism onto the racist members of the panel, as if to absolve the studio audience and the viewing audience of their own racism. For example, Donahue tells the audience at one point, “I know this upsets you. I know you don’t want to hear it, but these [racist] ideas are out there, and it’s important to look at them.” The “you” and the “out there” imply a broad chasm between the overtly racist views of the panelists and any potential (but less selfevident) racism in the audience. The solution implied by this definition of the problem comes from a white woman in the audience: “Then stay out of the public schools! Good! We don’t need you!” The public schools are constructed as a place free from racism, and all “we” need is to get rid of the small number of “them” who are causing a problem. Another gesture toward separating the audience from the racist guests is the repeated characterization of the racists as lower-class and uneducated. This is interesting, not only because it reflects the belief that racism is the prejudice of working-class, less-educated whites (especially Southern whites), but also because almost all of the panelists seem college-educated and middle-class! The racist guests assert this several times, despite being taunted by former Klansman Clary, with remarks like, “So, you want to teach your daughters? You better teach them how to say, ‘Welcome to McDonald’s, can I help you?’ and ‘You went to college? What did you learn in college, how to be a janitor?”’ These statements, which generate large amounts of laughter and applause from the audience, indicate how Clary maps racism onto the working-class. When faced with the fact that, with the exception of Stephanie, all the panelists did in fact go to college, Clary says they did not get the right kind of education while there. By displacing racism onto the attitudes of the white working-class, the show absolves the predominately middle-class and white audience of any responsibility. By displacing racism onto the Southern white working-class (through repeated references to “Bubba” and “poor white trash,” and the fact that all the racist panel members are from the South), the rest of the white viewing audience might very well leave the conversation thinking they have clean hands.