Popular Culture Review Vol. 18, No. 1, Winter 2007 | Page 77

“Screening” the Sexuality of Jean-Michel Basquiat: The Artist in Two Films Writing in 1994, bell hooks argued: Conflicted in his own sexuality, Basquiat is nevertheless represented in the Whitney Biennial Catalogue and elsewhere as the stereotypical black stud randomly fucking white women. No importance is attached by critics to the sexual ambiguity that was so central to the Basquiat diva persona. (35) The avoidance of the “conflicted” and “ambiguous” aspects of the black artist’s sexuality in favor of the portrayal of him as “the stereotypical black stud” is, as hooks points out, not unique to Whitney Museum’s 1992 retrospective. In the many films, books, essays, art catalogues, and retrospectives that have sought to remember Jean-Michel Basquiat since his death in 1988 at age 27 from a heroin overdose, there has been a general tendency to ignore or shy away from discussions and depictions of the queer activities that constituted the artist’s sexual existence and to focus, instead, only on his heterosexual practices. This paper argues that Edo Bertoglio’s Downtown 81 and Julian Schnabel’s Basquiat participate in this process in the way they “screen” the artist’s sexuality; in other words, as both films display the artist’s heterosexuality, they conceal the more controversial, queer activities that also comprised his sexual reality. As will be demonstrated here, the screening of Basquiat’s sexuality is consistent with a tradition of invisibility and silence surrounding the issue of black queerness, especially when dealing with black figures of serious investment. As JeanMichel Basquiat was at the time of his death and remains today “the most financially successful Black visual artist in history” (Tate 233), there is much at stake in the way in which he is constructed and portrayed for widespread public consumption. Thus, Downtown 81 and Basquiat frame Basquiat as unquestionably straight, even though he participated in sexual activities that would trouble his categorization as such. While this paper maintains that Downtown 81 and Basquiat both operate to screen Basquiat’s sexuality, they do so with such different intent and styles that some brief clarification is needed. Basquiat, written and directed by fellow artist and contemporary, Julian Schnabel, and released in 1996, eight years after the artist’s death, is a feature-length film that stars actor Jeffrey Wright as Basquiat. Although Schnabel’s film is a “blend of fact and fiction” (Adams 2), it presents itself as a biographical portrayal of the artist in that it proceeds chronologically tracing the artist’s life from childhood to death while pointing to important events and people along the way, and as such “they [the viewer] will treat it as a documentary” (hooks 5). Although Downtown 81,