Popular Culture Review Vol. 17, No. 2, Summer 2006 | Page 9

Pornumentaries and Sexploitation: The Cultural Signs of Sex The signs of sex permeate our increasingly visual cultural environment. Whether directly or implicitly, representations of sex are virtually inescapable in today’s society, in spite of (or precisely because of) our current neo-conservative climate. Advertisements, TV shows, films, all contribute to the creation of a pervasive, if only suggested, sexual narration which, strangely enough, has not yet benefited from the scholarly approach it deserves. It is a given that repressed sex does not disappear; on the contrary, it manifests itself in a variety of settings and through a myriad of symbols, more or less obvious; therefore, it becomes silent, unspoken sex, which reveals its voice when interpreted from a cultural point of view. Repressed sex, in the end, appears to be much louder and disturbing than it would be in a healthier, more open context and becomes a weapon of manipulation to serve corporative financial gain. Although our modem concepts of sex were bom in the nineteenth century (in 1869, to be exact1) it seems logical to start our discussion with religious iconography, for the prohibition of sex in our society is intimately related to judeo-christian morality. I will then trace this tendency through a few key cultural artifacts, including literary and cinematic works, as well as popular TV programs, in order to show how the prohibition of sex has become a necessary condition for its blatant exploitation. John Paul II literally turned the Vatican into a sainthood factory. During his tenure at the headquarters of Catholic Inc., he beatified 1,340 individuals and canonized more candidates than all popes combined during the last 500 years.2 The intent clearly was to provide the catholic church with new heroes, as well as grossly vast sums of money since the procedures of beatification and canonization cost in the neighborhood of half a million euros or dollars, depending on which bank arranges the transaction.3 Although John Paul II appeared to be fairly open minded when it came to beatification, accepting individuals from all walks of life, one constant remained: the candidate to beatification had to have been sexually irreproachable. Even secular individuals were considered, but only as long as they had left their families; that is to say, eternal life was only promised to those with no sexual life, thus perpetuating the long tradition of aggrandizing total sexual repression, a characteristic of the catholic church. The connection between the prohibition of sex and its financial exploitation is therefore easily established from the very start within the house of the lord; what must be emphasized, however, is that the narration of sex is present at the very core of catholic iconography in a subverted way, demonstrating further the undeniable relationship between sexual prohibition and perversion. For instance, from an objective, scholarly point of view, the figure of the crucifixion is a very realistic and titillating