Popular Culture Review Vol. 17, No. 2, Summer 2006 | Page 87

Man(kind) VS. Mountain “Now dear, summer’ll be coming along soon. What’ll it be: the beach or the mountains? Tan and dive into the breakers or camp and hike on the trails?” Who hasn’t met that challenge, with no losers? My point is: a mere two hundred or so years past, there wouldn’t have been a decision to make. Water, preferably the ocean beaches, was the only choice. Long, long ago mankind made some sort of peace, however uneasy, with the open waters, despite typhoons, the rare tsunami or maelstrom, hurricanes, and all manner of mere storms. Almost nobody considered mountains as anything but bleak, uninviting, even dangerous obstacles to human movement. There's been an obvious sea change, worth a generous look. For starters, we can posit two ways of regarding mountains—what they really are against what they mean to us. In dictionary words, mountains are minor rugosities on the almost spheroid we call earth. They are also receptors of snow and rain that feed the rivers that fertilize the crops, absent which, save for fish, we would all starve. What is miraculously more, they separate languages, indeed whole cultures. Consider the Pyrenees and the differences between French culture and that of Spain, or the Alps that sever northern from southern Europe. Closer to home, think of the massive Rockies and the Sierras as barriers against the growth of the United States. Finally, look at how the fastnesses of the Appalachians can separate the however miscalled “hillbillies" from the coastal and Midwestern peoples, linguistically and culturally. Before technology allowed us to blast roads out of the rocks or tunnel through them, or fly over them, mountains deeply affected the course of civilization. All this speaks to what mountains are or do, not how humanity reacts to them, a story far more complex, ‘‘Mountains of the Mind," as Robert Macfarlane so aptly calls them in his book of the same title. In civilization’s dawn age, quite universally then, mountains, like rivers, trees, the wind, were viewed animistically as live, sentient realities that must be worshipped or placated lest they bring harm on bemused, fearful humanity. Consider, for instance, creation myths, basically all animistic. Among the Hawaiian island people, Kauai was the early home of Pele, goddess of volcanoes, who could shake the land, move the waves, explode the mountains’ fire, and help evolve the landscape itself, with its canyons and precipitous cliffs. Molten lava was truly alive. Many a mountain, the world over, was considered sacred. Besides Pele’s lava-bearers, besides Olympos and Pamassos, think Navajo Mountain bordering Arizona and Utah, or the Himalayan Mt. Everest. In any event, mountains were no playground. If Moses ascended Mt. Sinai, it was not for exercise or enjoyment. The “high mountain” that Isaiah bids us to climb is spiritual not physical (x 1.9). There is a fine passage in Virgil’s Aeneid (XII 684-89) describing a