Popular Culture Review Vol. 15, No. 1 | Page 132

128 Popular Culture Review elite class of human yuppies? The answer is, not a whole lot, especially when those aliens have integrated so well that they read our magazines, drink at our bars, and even enjoy sexual relations with humans. Furthermore, Carpenter’s answer to the problems of the country, as voiced by an ass-kicking, gum-chewing John Nada, is sophomoric in its call to arms. Nada blows away aliens left and right, and eventually destroys the single satellite concealing the entire alien race from human view. As Jurkiewicz argues, Nada’s methods are little better than the ideals he is combating (39). This violent answer to the complicated problems of rehabilitating our society is made even more ridiculous when contrasted to the strong leftist political rhetoric that builds tension so well early in the film. Again, Carpenter voices his opinions on contemporary issues, this time through a pirate television station (notice the similarity between They Live and Prince o f Darkness in the use of video to transmit revolutionary thought). We are living in an artificially induced state of consciousness that resembles sleep. The poor and the underclass are growing. Racial justice and human rights are nonexistent. They have created a repressive society and we are their unwitting accomplices. Their intention to rule rests with the annihilation of consciousness. We have been lulled into a trance. They have made us indifferent to ourselves, to others. We are focused only on our own gain. Please, understand, they are safe as long as they are not discovered. That is their primary method to survive: Keep us asleep. Keep us selfish. Keep us sedated (Jurkiewicz 36). The substance of this broadcast, and similar passages throughout the film, give an impression of a complex and well-thought-out political message to They Live. Piper’s vigilante answer to the problems raised by these pirate transmissions and resistance fighters is, unfortunately, intellectually weak, yet probably necessary to draw the tonnage crowds to the theatre. Granted, it is difficult to cast Rowdy Roddy Piper without some contractual scenes of good, old-fashioned, God-Bless-the-USA butt kicking. Taken as a thematic trilogy, The Thing, Prince o f Darkness, and They Live can be forgiven their individual faults, mainly due to the quality with which Carpenter gets his message across. The Thing is the subtlest of the three, with Prince o f Darkness building in intensity in its accusations of foul play in American society. It then stands to reason that They Live should build further on the politics of the previous films, serving as an effective culmination of the themes of the three films as a whole.