Popular Culture Review Vol. 14, No. 2, Summer 2003 | Page 21

Project Kingfish 1951-1967 17 73). A review of Pathe’s Weekly in a prominent film magazine also expressed the newsreel’s philosophy, stating that it intends to cover the entire country as thor oughly as the Associated Press. The review added, “Who would not take part in the news of the world ‘just as it really happened’ as part of the regular picture enter tainment” CMoving Picture World, 1911, 359-360). By June 1914, the success of Pathe ’s Weekly led to a daily newsreel service. However, with the outbreak of World War I, Pathe returned to its regular weekly release under the revised title of Pathe News (Fielding, 1972, 78-79). Civilian newsreel industry coverage of World War I proved to be inadequate from beginning to end because of the numerous obstacles purposely created by military and civil authorities. Camera operators found it extremely difficult to gain access to the front line or even to film scenes of wartime preparation on the home front. Military authorities at the front forbade photographers to operate their cam eras for fear of drawing small-arms and artillery fire. Accordingly, faking of World War I coverage was common, particularly during the early months of the war. Authentic footage, often of poor quality and coverage, appeared sporadically. Two of the earliest American releases showed the British cruiser Caronia lying off Sandy Hook, New York, in wait of German transport vessels, and the siege of Antwerp in 1914. Front-line censors also hindered newsreel camera operators during World War I, and photographers went to great lengths to try to smuggle footage out of Europe and back to American laboratories (Fielding, 1972, 115-118, 122). The newsreel industry &Vv