Popular Culture Review Vol. 13, No. 2, Summer 2002 | Page 18

14 Popular Culture Review those ways of seeing those piled-up preconceptions, that spiritual dust and grime with which my eyes have covered it, is able to present it in all its virginal purity to my attention and consequently to my love (15). With reference to the idea of preservation in which this assertion is lodged, one might argue that Bazin mobilizes the concept of celluloid memory as a superior, and more ethical alternative to subjective memory, steeped as the latter is in the cosmetic modifications of our individual recollections. For a vivid enactment of the principle at the core of Bazin’s commemorative theory, consider this lengthy excerpt from Don DeLillo’s Americana (1971): I took the camera from my lap, raised it to my eye, leaned out the window a bit, and trained it on the ladies as if I were shooting. One of them saw me and immediately nudged her companion but without taking her eyes off the camera. They waved. One by one the others reacted. They all smiled and waved. They seemed supremely happy. Maybe they sensed that they were waving at themselves, waving in the hope that someday if evidence is demanded of their passage through time, demanded by their own doubts, a moment might be recalled when they stood in a dazzhng plaza in the sun and were registered on the transparent plastic ribbon; and thirty years away, on that day when proof is needed, it could be hoped that their film is being projected on a screen somewhere, and there they stand, verified, in chemical reincarnation, waving at their own old age, smiling their reassurance to the decades, a race of eternal pilgrims in a marketplace in the dusty sunlight, seven arms extended in a fabulous salute and to the forgetfulness of being. What better proof (if proof is ever needed) that they have truly been ahve? Their happiness, I think, was made of this, the anticipation of incontestable evidence, and had nothing to do with the present moment, which would pass with all the others into whatever is the opposite of eternity” (254). The characters in DeLillo’s novel, as the narrator makes clear, seem to derive their sense of rapture from their (mistaken) behef that they are being captured on film or, to use Laura Mulvey’s phrase, “fossilized on celluloid” (24). If the photographic image can be said to have a substance, a body, it is precisely this engraving of fossiliferous signs which verify memory in “chemical reincarnation.” Though Bazin’s thesis has always invited opposition, it has become particularly shaky in the current chmate where, as Matthews contends, “the digitization of the image threatens to cut the umbihcal cord between photograph and referent on which