Popular Culture Review Vol. 11, No. 2, Summer 2000 | Page 121

The ‘‘Great White” of Lambarene 117 perhaps you give, but you don’t share.” It is Bissa who also points out to Schweitzer that though he has seen thousands of African patients he made no attempt to understand the African languages. Schweitzer is unable to understand the changes in the African people that came with independence. He does not attend the festivities to honor independence day and he is shocked when Koumba returns, trained as a doctor and a lawyer, and comes in the official capacity to take over the administration of the hospital. Schweitzer’s response to independence is to retreat into his role as the “great white,” and he becomes even less tolerant and more paternalistic and abusive towards the Africans. He forms a relationship with the drummer who he has been trying to drown out, but he is the teacher, not the student, never bothering to understand what he may have learned from the African people in terms of music, language, spirituality, or culture. Even this relationship is fraught with paternalistic overtones. He buys a trumpet for the drummer and gives it to him. Yet, at the same time he refers to him as “the tom-tom maniac.” The complexity of this post-colonial relationship is rendered with great understanding of both sides. It is beautifully orchestrated by the camerawork and design which places the drummer outside the walls of Schweitzer’s colonial outpost, a prison of his own making, in a way, but also a prison of whiteness and colonial privilege. Schweitzer’s response to independence is to retreat into the past and fervently deny that his status as colonial white great man is in question. At about this time, Schweitzer isbeing considered for the Nobel Peace Prize. The arrival of a white journalist, Ingrid Lombard (Elizabeth Bourgine), marks the arrival of post colonialism in the world of Albert Schweitzer. For the first time, Schweitzer is attacked and criticized for his behavior, but Schweitzer’s initial response is to embrace the moment of the Journalist’s arrival as an opportunity for rebuilding himself into the ‘'Great White.” Though at first he says there will be no photographs, soon Schweitzer is posing as the “great white doctor” in a series of self-revealing postures of nineteenth century photographic portraiture. Schweitzer’s lack of respect for the African people is evident in the scene in which he and the Joumalist use Africans as human props. Schweitzer and the Joumalist pose a group of Africans in a boat with Schweitzer “as if returning from a great trip.” This scene is a particularly important deconstruction of the politics of ethnographic photography and imperialist control of images of African people. It is a self-retlexive moment in a film that emerges from a decolonized gaze. To suddenly switch to the colonizing gaze of the journalist’s camera is to jolt the viewer out of the decolonized gaze and into a position of examining the positionality of the colonized gaze. This is a deeply pivotal moment in the film, for it enacts on the screen the remarks of Trinh T-Minh-ha, who writes that the goal is “not that merely of correcting the images whites have of non-whites, nor of reacting to the