PM@CH Journal 2017 December 2017 | Page 6

The Swiss Project Management Journal The People Project to be constantly briefed and re-briefed with their communications evaluated for impact.   We had to be constantly alert for new rumors, and respond through several channels.   Though they had the best of intentions, sometimes these would even originate from our own existing stake- holders. It was a constant process of doing something, monitoring, evaluating, re- adjusting and doing again. This looks a lot like Agile does it not? Constant re-assessment, re-tooling, addressing if your work is delivering value.   The difference here is that your value is in the number of survivors, not in the amount of coding accomplished, or web portals implemented. As with corporate projects in offices, these challenges in implementing actions do not exempt you from bureaucratic challenges either.   Donors wanted reports Project Management Institute SWITZERLAND Chapter 6 health worker’s standard equipment.   If they are available, which is not often, they are not the right size, or are unreliable from having being stored in improper conditions. Even if the materials are there, you must look at the whole use cycle of a product: how are the different pieces put on to ensure maximum safety and more importantly how are they re- moved so that the person does not conta- minate himself or herself? This situation happened to nurses in the United States who were highly trained and had the best possible equipment, managing that risk in a makeshift treatment centre with staff who have only received limited training on the materials is a massive task. You assess the situation, develop a task list, note dependencies, identify available capabilities and capacities, assemble a team as best you can with the resources available and get to work. You not only have to communicate with your stakeholders, but educate them as well, like dealing with beliefs that the illness is caused by bad spirits.   As the outbreak evolves, so does your situation, risk is ever changing based not only on the hard facts of the disease situation, but also on public opinion. One of the most frightening experiences I have of communication with the public being poorly managed was being threatened by a group of men playing a casual game of soccer (and their friend, armed with a Kalashnikov) who were angry. They had not been informed by the government that an Ebola Treatment Centre was being prepared in their area, and only when the sign was placed on the building did they know.   We need to realize that even our stakeholders have their own projects to manage, some of which can impact us. We had to go out and cultivate project champions- local authorities, celebrities, anyone who could help us communicate concise and true information to battle rumors and adjust public perception of the risk to be closer to reality. These champions needed on activities, including pictures.   In a normal situation this would be easy, but when it takes 20 minutes to send 1 high resolution picture through your internet connection, sending enough material for the satisfaction of the donor who is making your presence there possible is just one more hurdle of many. Disaster relief is another area where project management skills are pervasive, but not traditionally seen as project management within the responding agencies.   The rebuilding afterwards is readily seen as a project, but the planning, execution and standing down of the deployment of personnel, equipment and supplies, is often not. Setting up disease surveillance in shelters was not seen as a project, as the diseases were already notifiable before the floods, and the go- vernment continued to collect informa- 2017 Edition