16
BUSINESS AND TRAINING
Building contracts and the Covid-19 pandemic
By
Uwe Putlitz
Plumbing Africa welcomes our newest contributor , Uwe Putlitz , who will address the issues of the ‘ contract ’ and why sub-contractors must pay attention to the contents and especially when changes are made for what ever reason , these must be recorded in writing .
The building and construction industry in Southern Africa generally uses one of the four Standard-Form Contracts ( SfC ) accepted by the Construction Industry Development Board ( CIDB ) for use by State-owned companies and , of course , by all private sector employers : 1 . FIDIC ( French acronym for International Federation of Consulting Engineers ), published in Switzerland in English and in French 1999 + 2017 .
2 . GCC – General Conditions of Contract for Construction Works , published in South Africa ( GCC 2004 ) + 2015 .
3 . JBCC – The Joint Building Contracts Committee , published in South Africa ( JBCC series 2000 ) + 2018 .
4 . NEC – New Engineering Contract , published in the United Kingdom ( NEC also referred to as the Engineering and Construction Contract ECC ) 2013 + 2017 .
What is a Standard-form Contract ( SfC )? Either party may draft its own form of contract to limit some common law obligations . The choice of wording , content , risk allocation and application may be unique to a project and may contain or omit obligations typically stipulated in the industry creating uncertainty in interpretation by the user should any claims arise . Thus , SfCs have been developed in cooperation with industry representative bodies to spread risks equitably . When competently used , SfCs provide a checklist to guide the execution of a project . To quote Lord Diplock from : 1974 Modern Engineering v Gilbert-Ash , a SfC “ is an entire contract for the sale of goods and work and labour for a lump sum price payable by instalments as the goods are delivered and the work done . Decisions have to be made from time to time about such essential matters as the making of variation orders , the expenditure of provisional and prime cost sums and extension of time for the carrying out of the work under the contract ”.
All SfCs have similar headings in much the same order : |
1 . |
Definition and Interpretation . |
2 . |
The parties . |
3 . |
Design criteria . |
4 . |
Risk allocation . |
5 . |
Works description . |
6 . |
Specialist contractors . |
7 . |
Completion and adjustments . |
8 . |
Payments and adjustments . |
9 . |
Suspension . |
10 . Dispute resolution . |
11 . Agreement … where the parties sign the agreement . |
What is ‘ force majeure ’? Some SfCs refer to an ‘ exceptional event ’, others to ‘ force majeure ’ ( as do some insurance policies ) as an event that neither party could have reasonably foreseen , avoided or overcome that is beyond its control .
Some definitions include events such as ‘ natural catastrophes , civil commotion or war , civil commotion ’, often followed by the wording : ‘ but not limited to ’ …
The rapid spread globally of the Covid-19 pandemic and consequent local restrictions to economic and other activities in terms of the ‘ regulations published under the Disaster Management Act , 2002 ’ and ‘ the State of Emergency Act , 1997 ’ would fall into this category . 1
The contractor must be excused for such delay from performing his contractual obligations or , in an extreme scenario , may be completely excused from performance .
The determination of additional time to complete a project is relatively straightforward in this scenario . The difficulty arises when allocating costs incurred because of such delay . Generally , where the employer is at fault , the contractor must be compensated . In the Covid-19 scenario neither party is to blame , so should the additional costs be shared equally by the parties ?
1 “ The present lockdown will probably amount to casus fortuitus , which is an incidence of vis major , and which is defined as an exceptional or extraordinary occurrence which was not reasonably foreseeable1 . It has been held2 that plague is an incidence of casus fortuitus . In our view , the present COVID-19 outbreak is analogous , and the resultant government bans constitute vis major . “ 1 See Spolander v Ward 1940 CPD 24 2 Stockham & De Jong v Kaplansky & Co ( 1901 ) 18 SC 156 and Joe v Mahomet ( 1901 ) 11 CTR 816 Quoted from ‘ GVS - for commercial legal solutions ’ opinion for SAPOA 2020-03 24
www . plumbingafrica . co . za @ plumbingonline @ plumbingonline @ PlumbingAfricaOnline November 2021 Volume 27 I Number 9