Plumbing Africa May 2019 | Page 73

INDUSTRY MATTERS 71 services rational design. All other designs must be submitted as deem to satisfy by those not governed by an official body. service offered by engineering companies. In recent years however, the role has become more common at bigger engineering firms. Most municipalities will accept the CoC issued by the plumber, with the plumber taking responsibility for the practical installation. Issues arise in the industry when clients, mainly developers, use this to accelerate the process and avoid employing a wet services engineer. While experienced in their own way, they may choose products or services that do not suit the type of solutions required for the project. The choices may be based on similar installations, but in reality, not fit for purpose for all installations. Based on the previous necessary designations discussed, the plumber is not listed under Form 2, is not an ECSA registered professional, and therefore cannot sign for a wet services rational design. As part of a rapidly evolving industry, it’s imperative that the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) adopts new technologies and emerging products. Key people should be involved at the onset of projects to ensure that the right roles are filled by the right people. Wet services engineers, plumbers, and builders should be consulted with and included throughout the process to ensure that design, installation, and product meets the local requirements. Local standards must be better enforced and communicated to ensure they are treated as compulsory. While this appears to be a good solution at the time, when the time comes for a building to be commissioned and problems are found with the plumbing, the client seeks the opinion of an engineer. This reactive response results in a severed relationship between the plumber and engineer, when the plumber shouldn’t have been given the authority by the client and shouldn’t have accepted the work. The result is re-work, correcting structural mistakes, and trying to fix a system that was built incorrectly. This can lead to more money spent by clients to fix the problems or even legal action taken against the plumbing contractor by developers. SO WHAT’S THE PROBLEM? Quality is an integral part of any technical process. A prevalent issue in the industry is non-competent engineers or architects signing off on wet services rational designs. When drawings go to building inspectors and they see a professional engineer designation, they do not question the authority of the signature. However, when things go wrong, the responsibility falls on the signee who will be held accountable for any issues with the project. The general rule of thumb is to employ the right professionals to fill the right roles. A wet services engineer should be employed for specialist operations. This isn’t the norm because historically, this wasn’t a common www.plumbingafrica.co.za In South Africa as an example, it is common for residents to throw bottles, towels, rags, and nappies down the drain. This behaviour must change if we want to advance to more innovative piping systems. A PROPOSAL FOR SOLVING THE CHALLENGE As drastic as the steps may be, there needs to be a change in the industry as a whole. Developers and construction contractors need to understand the different roles involved in the process. More specifically, the role of a wet services engineer falling under the mechanical and civil scope of works as categorised at ECSA, needs to be more clearly defined. Sign-off of installations all depends on each council and the appointed inspector’s understanding of what a ‘competent person’ is. This is where ECSA and the South African Institute of Civil Engineering (SAICE) must educate the inspectors on what characteristics a competent person has, as well as the whole list of items they would need to check for. Councils should also implement a background check for the appointed engineer using the ECSA website that lists what the areas of registration for each engineer are, or a simple phone call to ask for the information required. IN CONCLUSION All players in the sector need to perform the work they are competent to fulfil to ensure that profitability, timelines, and reputation are not threatened. Individuals filling key roles must understand each participant’s function and where each function ends in order to create a successful end product. PA May 2019 Volume 25 I Number 3