Plumbing Africa May 2019 | Page 57

TECHNICAL Friction loss increases exponentially with an increase in the speed of the water, roughly by the square of the speed; that is, if the water speed doubles, friction loss will be roughly four times as much. Different piping materials have different frictional loss characteristics due to the wall thicknesses of the various materials as well as the smoothness of the internal surface, known as the ‘roughness factor’. PRACTICAL EXERCISE Determine the friction loss on a given pipe run and make a pipe size selection The task/brief You are asked to install a galvanised mild steel (SANS 62-1 medium class) pipeline feeding 10 high-pressure toilet flushing valves (Cobra Junior Flushmasters) located in a new ablution block on a warehouse site. The routing of the piping is in the ground from an existing on-site 100mm water supply. The length of the new run is 100m from the source of supply to which you will connect. The lowest expected on-site water pressure at the point where you will connect in this case is given as 400kPa — but you must always check this before commencing work, using a pressure gauge. The lowest measured pressure over a period should be used. The newly installed Flushmasters are located on the first floor of an existing building and are 3m (elevation) above the source of supply (remembering that 1m of ‘head’ is equivalent to 10kPa either gained or lost. In this case, it is a loss of 30kPa). Since the pipe run will be installed in the ground, noise is not a factor, so in terms of SANS 10252:1, a water velocity of 3m/sec. is acceptable for buried pipelines. The architect has specified Junior Flushmasters and top-entry W/C pans. These flush valves require 65ℓ/min. at 200kPa flow pressure to work properly (see Figure 1 — a manufacturer’s specifications). The expected flow demand on the new line is 130ℓ/min., which you might estimate as follows: Each of these valves requires a flow rate of 65ℓ/min. There are 10 valves, but it is highly improbable that all 10 could ever be flushed at once. Most probable would be two being used simultaneously, resulting in an assumed and reasonable probable flow demand of 130ℓ/min. This concurs roughly with SANS 10252:1 as well as simultaneous usage flow demand tables given by www.plumbingafrica.co.za 55 the manufacturer for this product and the project type; that is, a warehouse facility. Note: The calculation of flow demand (Q) is always based on reasonable assumptions and is not an exact science. There are many ways of doing this. SANS 10252:1 (4.2.2 Probable (or design) Flow Demand) gives reference to one method among many others. To summarise the above information: • Pressure available: 400kPa • Required flow pressure at the terminal fittings: 200kPa • Required flow demand: 130ℓ/min. • Length of pipe: 100m • Pipe material: medium-class galvanised mild steel (SANS 62-1) • Elevation above source: 3m (height of new fittings above water supply source). For this example, a few simple sums are necessary: Available pressure 400kPa Less elevation of 3m − 30kPa Subtotal 370kPa Less required pressure − 200kPa Affordable pressure loss in pipe 170kPa If we divide the affordable pressure loss by the pipe length plus 25% (25% to allow for future encrustation, bends, tees, and other in-line fittings such as line strainers), then: Affordable pressure loss (170kPa) ÷ pipe length (100m + 25% = 125m) = Permissible friction loss of 1.36kPa per metre of pipe run Now refer to the friction loss table, Figure 2, to determine a suitable pipe size. Result By entering Figure 2 from right to left at the 130ℓ/ min. mark, it can be seen that a 32mm galvanised pipe (red line) will yield a friction loss of 2m/m, whereas from our sums above, we can only afford to lose 1.36kPa/m. The next pipe size up is a 40mm pipe (green line), which will serve well since the friction loss will only be 1kPa/m. In both instances, the water velocity is in order; that is, approximately 2.2m/sec. on the 32mm pipe and 1.7m/ sec. on the 40mm pipe, but the friction loss is too high on the 32mm pipe. May 2019 Volume 25 I Number 3