Plumbing Africa July 2017 | Page 33

Health and sanitation 31 A dose of 30mJ/cm 2 achieved 99.999% (5-log) reduction in 20 minutes in a recirculating model premise plumbing system under three different test conditions (non-turbid water at 25 degrees C (77 degrees F); turbid water at 25 degrees C; and non-turbid water at 43 degrees C (109.4 degrees F)). However, viable numbers of L. pneumophila remained in the treated water despite six hours of continuous UV light exposure. UV irradiation was not affected by turbid conditions or increased temperature. (Muraca et al., 1987). Usually, there are limited opportunities for exposure to light for water treated and held in premise plumbing systems. However, if there is a significant opportunity for light repair (repair of UV- induced DNA damage using photo-reactivating light), such as in water used in tubs, pools and baths, a higher UV dose should be considered. At a UV dose adequate to achieve 99.9% (3-log) reduction of L. pneumophila, subsequent exposure to fluorescent light for one hour resulted in only a 68% (0.5-log) reduction following initial inactivation by low pressure (LP) UV lamps and only 60% (0.4-log) reduction following inactivation by medium pressure (MP) UV lamps (Oguma et al., 2004). Similar significant light repair of legionella has been observed by others (Knudson, 1985). Potential water quality issues UV disinfection does not produce a disinfectant residual (USEPA, 2007). Also, when UV disinfection is applied to waters containing a disinfectant residual, the residual may be diminished following treatment with UV (USEPA, 2006c). Therefore, water treated using only UV disinfection may be, in some cases, susceptible to contamination at downstream points. More than one type of disinfection or other control measure may be needed to protect the treated water downstream of UV disinfection, between the UV lamp and the taps and other water outlets (for example showerheads). At UV doses typically used in drinking water, UV disinfection does not support the formation of regulated DBPs (USEPA, 2006c). In addition, UV disinfection does not change the pH or treated water quality in such a way as to make it more corrosive to premise plumbing (USEPA, 2006c). Mercury can be released into the treated water when a UV lamp breaks (Wright et al., 2012). The amount of mercury that could potentially enter the water depends on the type of lamp and operation. Vapor phase mercury can dissolve into solution and be discharged downstream whereas liquid phase or amalgam mercury would tend to settle in the UV reactor. The author recommends developing a mercury mitigation plan (Wright et al., 2012). PA UV is only effective at inactivating legionella in the water that flows through the UV reactor. July 2017 Volume 23 I Number 5