Plant Equipment and Hire October 2018 | Page 42

INSIGHT By Cobus Coetzee Operating in one of the most dangerous career choices available, keeping updated with safety compliance and technologies within construction cannot be overstated. W hile often used, the ‘safety compliance’ phrase in construction is sometimes not fully comprehended. True safety compliance can only be achieved when companies implement an effective safety management system as part of their daily operations and not a once-off drive to comply with clients’ specifications to have their safety file accepted, or to pass a safety audit successfully. All companies have a moral obligation to ensure they provide a safe and healthy work environment for staff as well as the communities surrounding their operations, who can be affected either positively or negatively. Too often, compliance is seen as a tick-box exercise — a document and a signature to prove that you have communicated the document or that it was approved. True safety compliance requires that the company evaluates the specific requirements and then develops effective processes and systems to meet the requirements. Unfortunately, companies often fail to continually monitor changes in legislation or standards, missing the opportunity to evolve their company systems at a manageable rate. Instead, systems and procedures are only updated when it becomes a requirement that affects their ability to procure new projects or contracts, often at great expense. Sometimes, quick implementation of new requirements or standards is not sustainable and can endanger the company’s existence at times, resulting in lengthy policies and procedures, in the hope that ‘more is better’ without understanding the impact of the new requirements or standards — and the ability of the company to comply with them. It is my opinion that you need to follow the KIS-KIS (Keep It Short, Keep It Simple) principle when developing systems and documents and you need to understand the core requirements of the new specifications or legislation and then incorporate this into the safety management system. Clear, timely, and effective communication to all interested parties is key to ensuring compliance. The parties can be either internal or external and the degree of impact the changes will have will be based on the scope of the relevant interested party. Continual review and analysis of legislative, industry, and company requirements will allow the company to identify possible changes in advance and decide on actions to gradually implement them effectively. 40 OCTOBER 2018 SAFETY COMPLIANCE IN CONSTRUCTION True safety compliance comes when companies implement an effective system. The process for the review of South African legislation and standards has set parameters that must be operated in to ensure effective and inclusive legislation and standards. This includes affording industry and the public 90 days to comment and make recommendations to any draft legislation or standard that has been gazetted. However, there are some exceptions to this process as the publication and distribution of the new Construction Regulations 2014 construction work permit exemption notice on 1 August 2018 clearly indicates. Failure to fully understand the new construction work permit requirements can result in companies applying for work permits when not required, thereby flooding the system and impacting on the ability of the legislative body to review and approve relevant permit applications. Technological developments that occur in the construction industry are also sometimes overlooked. However, while new developments can result in opportunities for company growth and development — proceed with caution. Required and proper analysis must be done to ensure that a perceived new opportunity does not bring with it a threat that will outweigh the benefits, increasing the company’s risk profile. Any increase in risk profile will require other risk management processes to be performed, including reviewing current operational practices, possibly training requirements, and risk assessments and procedures. In conclusion, all companies need to establish an effective and proactive monitoring and review process to assist them in understanding the needs and requirements of their specific industry and of the interested parties that can impact on their ability to become fully safety compliant. ■ ABOUT THE AUTHOR Cobus Coetzee is operational and compliance director at SHEQprof, with vast experience in all aspects of SHERQ, across different industries, including mining, FMCG, mechanical and civil engineering, building, and general construction. He serves on multiple committees with government entities and industry leaders and is a registered CHSM with SACPCMP, as well as a Technical Member with SAIOSH.