Pickleball Magazine 1-1 | Page 49

The Cure to the Ratings Headache? “…And I’m listening to one of our local pickleball club members, a retired math professor, talk about his idea for an improved ratings system, and I realize, ‘I think I know somebody who can create this.’” That is how Kevin Richards, one of three founders of PickleballRatings.com, describes the moment last summer that his vision for a new ratings system platform was born. He called his friend Brian Hendrickson that night and explained the concept. They pulled in Anne Braghero, another trusted friend with website design experience, and over the course of the next few months the trio created PickleballRatings.com, which contains a very robust player ratings platform. They launched the site in conjunction with their trip to Nationals in Casa Grande, AZ, in November. This is where we caught up with them. How is the ratings system you created different than the one the USAPA currently uses? Because the system currently being used by USAPA is based on human evaluation, it is subjective. Our ratings system is entirely objective, derived from a mathematical algorithm and a player’s past results. Ratings systems like it are commonly used in other professional and amateur sports as a predictor of the outcome of a match, or game. The larger the discrepancy in the rating between two opponents, the more the lower rated opponent’s rating will increase should he/ she defeat the higher rated opponent. If the difference in their ratings is negligible, neither opponent’s rating will go up or down much at all from a victory or defeat. streamline the world of pickleball tournament management. Additionally, we are working on a solution for pickleball clubs to use since we’ve heard how challenging it can be for clubs to rate their members and seed their own round-robin tournaments. If your ratings system is not being used by the USAPA, what is the usefulness of it? What is your vision for how pickleballratings.com will fit into the growing world of pickleball? We have been very proactive in communicating with the USAPA regarding our work. In fact, we gave a demo to Chris Thomas, USAPA Ratings Chair, recently at Nationals. We answered a lot of great questions from Chris about how our system works and he opened our eyes to a few things as well. They are doing their due diligence in creating a new system but have a process that they need to follow. It is our hope that our solution will dovetail perfectly with the needs of the USAPA and its members. We’ll see what happens. Regarding the usefulness of our system, tournament organizers can easily and quickly put together balanced and logical brackets using the ratings of the players/teams that have registered for their event. We’ll be able to share more info soon about the collaboration underway with the hardworking Melissa McCurley and Greg Thompson at PickleballTournaments.com, but suffice it to say that this partnership is going to really FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT WWW.PICKLEBALLRATINGS.COM Well, our mission is to render accurate, objective, and timely ratings for as many pickleballers globally as possible. The beauty of this system is that the more crosspollination there is between players from different regions and countries, the more universally accurate the system itself becomes. Because this system solves such a real and widespread problem, we believe it will be quite popular and well-used. We have a lot of other ideas about features to add to our site, but our bread-and-butter will always be the pursuit of rendering objective ratings for as many pickleballers as possible. • The founders of pickleballratings.com, all from Portland, Oregon, are Kevin Richards (Community Relations), Brian Hendrickson (Ratings Scientist), and Anne Braghero (Site Design/User Experience). On cold rainy days, Kevin dreams of premier indoor pickleball courts. Brian is a 4.5 tennis player and teaches table tennis at Rose City Hall, his Portland venue. While maintaining her lifelong passion for soccer, Anne has embraced pickleball as her go-to activity. JANUARY 2016 | MAGAZINE 47