Physicians Office Resource Volume 8 Issue 09 | Page 39

THE HEAT IS ON: REIMBURSEMENT CHALLENGES ASSOCIATED WITH PHYSICIAN OFFICE LABORATORIES Jennifer Bolen, JD D self-audit education to facilitate laboratory compliance and a sustainable billing and reimbursement platform. rug testing and medication monitoring play an important role in clinical practice, specifically for providers engaged in chronic pain management and the office-based treatment of opioid addiction. Increasingly, physicians are considering the establishment of in-office laboratories (commonly referred to as Physician Office Laboratories or POLS) as additional revenue centers. More significantly, some physicians are facing the daunting task of restructuring their POL and completely revamping the POL billing and coding charge master, test panels, and testing protocols and documentation because of the inept handling of the same by third party laboratory management companies - some of which were paid for testing on a per analyte basis. Physicians in a lab restructure situation are truly facing the heat because they have come under a Medicare Zone Program Integrity Contractor (ZPIC) audit, and are facing a high percentage of claims denials, recoupment action, and prepayment review. This can ultimately result in the need to shut down the POL and forego any billing so that a team of experts could come in and untangle the significant mess and mismanagement caused by third-party vendors who lack expertise on laboratory billing, coding, compliance, and reimbursement matters. POL laboratory owners and associated providers would serve themselves well by gathering information about these payor investigations , billing, coding, and coverage changes, , and engaging true experts to facilitate an updated POL testing platform, billing check-up and OIG Activity In 2014, the US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General (HHS-OIG) has announced two significant OIG settlements with clinical laboratories and their physician-owners, capturing collectively more than $20 million to settle fraud and abuse cases associated with testing for drugs of abuse, including the inappropriate use of modifier 59 with qualitative screening code G0431, and medically unnecessary claims for reimbursement associated with specimen validity testing. In July 2014, the OIG issued (1) a Special Fraud Alert governing aspects of clinical laboratory and specimen collection and patient database and registry arrangements, and (2) a report on Questionable Billing for Medicare Part B Clinical Laboratory Services. This report calls for stronger oversight of labs and identification of specific issues with Medicare payments for lab services that need to be addressed to more effectively safeguard Medicare. The report contains three main recommendations, all gaining the concurrence of CMS and a guarantee that there will be more action in the near future. The OIG specifically calls for (1) a review of those laboratories already identified as having questionable billing; (2) a reevaluation of existing program integrity strategies to determine whether they are working and whether changes must be 39 www.PhysiciansOfficeResource.com