Physicians Office Resource Volume 8 Issue 07 | Page 47

2014 REGULATORY CHANGES MEAN BIG CHANGES FOR SOME, SMALL CHANGES FOR OTHERS Maria S. Hardy, IMA (ASCP) Technical Writer, COLA Resources, Inc. (CRI) M criteria in this article. When fully functional and exchangeable, the benefits of EHRs offer far more than a paper record can. Electronic Health Records/Electronic Medical Records: • Improve quality and convenience of patient care • Increase patient participation in their care • Improve accuracy of diagnoses and health outcomes • Improve care coordination • Increase practice efficiencies and cost savings Beginning in 2014, the reporting of clinical quality measures (CQMs) has changed for all providers. EHR technology that has been certified to the 2014 standards and capabilities will contain new CQM criteria, and eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals, and critical access hospitals (CAHs) will report using the new 2014 criteria regardless of whether they are participating in Stage 1 or Stage 2 of the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs. Although CQM reporting has been removed as a core objective for both EPs and eligible hospitals and CAHs, all providers are required to report on CQMs in order to demonstrate meaningful use. The following are CMS communications regarding CQMs for 2014. any Physician Office Laboratories (POL’s) have begun the transition from the paper, old recordkeeping system to the new, streamlined electronic health or medical records systems. This migration has been encouraged in many cases due to the U.S. Government’s financial support programs that offer incentives for healthcare facilities to make the change. One challenge has been the evolution of technology often moves faster than the speed of legislation, implementation and general understanding of the process. The regulatory process regarding EHR/EMR has always been turtle-like in its conception and implementation. At each stage of updating and in some cases upgrading a practice’s EHR/EMR it is always prudent to determine not only where the next step will lead, but also what is required for compliance. If a physician’s practice accepts patients under Medicare, Medicaid, or is part of an ACO there has probably been much discussion about Meaningful Use (MU), Measurable Outcomes and EHR/EMR. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) are groups of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers, who come together voluntarily to give coordinated high quality care to their Medicare patients. With this coordination comes the necessity for documentation. Documentation not only drives the method of care delivery but also the financial aspect of patient care. The 2014 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Clinical Quality Measures have been published and we will review some important 2014 and Beyond For 2014, CMS is not requiring the submission of a core set of CQMs.  Instead we identify two recommended core sets of CQMs, one for 47 www.PhysiciansOfficeResource.com