PUBLIC VERSION
competition between the domestic product and imports was attenuated because they served different markets. The Commission explained:
We are not persuaded by Respondents’ argument that competition between the cumulated subject imports and the domestic product is attenuated because they serve different parts of the QSP market and that the domestic like product is a luxury product not sold to the broader market. As noted above, the domestic like product and cumulated subject imports are sold in the same patterns and product types and the record shows that domestic products were competing with cumulated subject imports for sales to a variety of end users. With respect to Cambria, which was the focus of respondents’ arguments, the record shows that it competes for sales to various types of end users and does not simply serve the high end of the residential U. S. market for QSP. It reports making sales to commercial projects, as well as to mass retailers such as Home Depot and Costco. Contrary to Respondents’ contentions, the record indicates that Cambria sells to builders’ residential projects. There is also information in the current record indicating that other U. S. slab producers( including USA Quartz, Estone, LG Hausys, Caesarstone, and Dal‐Tile) … compete in the mass market sector of the U. S. market for QSP and that subject producers from India and Turkey also market their QSP as luxury products. 148
The bottom line is that the domestic industry had growing and ample excess capacity over the POI to serve the U. S. market but was robbed of the opportunity to do so by a flood of low-priced imports.
3. Substitutability The ability of imports to rapidly capture sales and market share from the domestic industry is aided by the high degree of substitutability between imported QSP and domestically produced QSP. In the investigations on QSP from China, the Commission found that“ there is a high degree of substitutability between domestically produced QSP and QSP imported from China, and that price is an important factor in purchasing decisions.” 149 Similarly, in the
148 QSP from India & Turkey Inv Final, USITC Pub. 5061 at 35-36.
149 QSP from China Inv Final, USITC Pub. 4913 at 26.
52