Peace & Stability Journal Volume 2, Issue 4 | Page 19

Disaster Response—a Military Perspective of the March 2011 Mega-Disaster Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement (2004). Since Japan and the United States do not have an integrated headquarters like the United States does with Korea and NATO, bilateral coordination centers at the strategic, operational and tactical levels were envisioned in the event of regional contingencies. While not intended for HA/DR, these coordination centers were set up at JMOD Emergency HQ, USAJ HQ and JTF HQ approximately three hours after the earthquake.15 It was the first opportunity to validate the centers in the actual operation. The organization of these coordination centers, in conjunction with numerous bilateral exercises and discussions, underscored the effective partnership of Japanese and American security forces. Moreover, the rapid mobilization of “forward presence” U.S. units and the proven Japan-U.S. interoperability undergirded the solid Japanese-U.S. alliance. In June 2011, Japan and U.S. Ministers for defense and foreign affairs reported to the Security Consultative Committee that “the close and effective cooperation between Japan and the United States in response to the disasters demonstrated the special bond enjoyed by our two countries. . . . This experience will serve as a model of future responses to contingencies of all kinds.”16 Lessons Learned Operations by JSDF and U.S. Forces showcased the effectiveness of the military during a mega-disaster. JSDF assessed that its first response and activities for victims were sufficient given the circumstances. Similarly, U.S. Forces assessed that pre-existing infrastructure, robust CENTRIXS network, veteran communicators from all four services, and the early development of an information standard operating procedures contributed to the success.17 Nevertheless, JSDF determined there were still several areas for improvement.18 First is the need for a closer relationship with local authorities. Significant shortfalls existed in regards to search and rescue, lifesaving, and evacuation because of the huge number of victims and JSDF unanticipated requirements such as mortuary affairs. Reinforcements deployed from other regions had to collaborate with communities rapidly in around-the-clock missions. Clearly, procedures were needed to facilitate cooperation and coordination. Second is the need for the integration of joint forces. The JSDF joint forces were first established in 2006. Consequently, coordination among all headquarters, especially on command and control as well as air tasking orders, was problematic. On the other hand, despite deploying half of the JSDF to cope with the mega-disaster, the remaining joint forces still maintained their normal defense missions (warning and surveillance, etc). Third is the need to enhance the Japan-U.S. partnership. Operation TOMODACHI highlighte