Per Concordiam: “Partnering Against Violence: Tackling ex-
tremism requires cooperation,” Journal of European Security and
Defense, Issues 1, No. 4, 2011, pp. 43, 62; George C. Marshall
Foundation Home Page, “The Marshall Plan,” available from
https://marshallfoundation.org/marshall/the-marshall-plan/
history-marshall-plan/, accessed on February 25, 2018, pp. 8-9.
4
AJP 9; NATO, Allied Joint Publication (AJP) 3.4.9, Allied
Joint Doctrine for Civil-Military cooperation, Brussels: NATO
Standardization Agency, 2013.
5
Leon E. Panetta, Strategy for Homeland Defense and Defense
Support of Civil Authorities, Washington, DC: U.S. Govern-
ment Printing Office, February 2013.
6
Donald Trump, National Security Strategy of the United States
of America December, Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office, December 2017.
7
Department of Defense, Joint Publication ( JP) 1, Doctrine for
the Armed Forces of the United States, Washington, DC: U.S.
Government Printing Office, 2013, pp. xi, I-11-I-14; Depart-
ment of Defense, Joint Publication ( JP) 3-57.1, Joint Doctrine
for Civil Affairs, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing
Office, 2003, pp. GL-9, 10.
8
Civil-Military Cooperation Center of Excellence (CCOE):
“CIMIC Field Handbook: 4th Edition,” Civil-Military Co-
operation Center of Excellence (CCOE), 2016, p. I-3-2; AJP
3.4.9, p. vii; Per Concordiam, p. 63.
9
AJP 3.4.9, pp. 2-1-2-5.
10
Christopher Ankersen, The Politics of Civil-Military Coopera-
tion, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, pp. 4-5, 51-70;
Canada Department of Defense, B-GG-005-004/AF-023, Civ-
il-Military Cooperation in Peace, Emergencies, Crisis and War,
Canada: Canadian National Defence, 1999, chap 4, 5.
11
AJP 3.4.9, pp. 2-2, 4-1; CCOE, pp. I-1-1-I-1-3, I-1-6-I-1-9.
12
B-GG-005-004/AF-023, pp. 4-1-4-2, 4-5; Department of
Defense, Joint Publication ( JP) 3-57, Civil-Military Opera-
tions, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office,
2013, pp. I-2, I-1, I-5.
13
JP 3-57.1, p. IV-11. The civil environment is a composite of
population, civil authorities, international organizations, gov-
ernmental organizations, and non-governmental organizations.
14
Ankersen, pp. 4, 5, 7.
15
United Nations: “UN-CMCoord Field Handbook,” United
Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs,
2015, p. 89.
16
Headquarters, Department of the Army, TRADOC Pam-
phlet 525-5-600, The United States Army’s Concept of Op-
erations, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office,
2008, p. 11.
17
AJP 3.4.9, p. vii; CCOE, pp. I-1-1, I-3-1.
18
Franke Volker: “The Peacebuilding Dilemma: Civil-Military
Cooperation in Stability Operations,” International Journal of
3
Peace Studies 11, No. 2, Autumn/Winter 2006, pp. 5, 7.
19
Hans-Jürgen Kasselmann: “Civil-Military Cooperation: A
Way to Resolve Complex Crisis Situations,” PRISM 4, No. 1, p.
21.
20
James G. Stavridis: “Building Strategic Connections,” Per
Concordiam: Journal of European Security and Defense Issues 1,
No. 4, 2011, p. 9; idem: “Strengthening the Bridge: Building
Partnership Capacity,” US Army, February 26, 2010.
21
Marco Paulino Serronha: “Optimization of Civil-military
Synergies in the Field of Crisis Management,” Nação e Defesa,
No. 129, 2011, pp. 131, 137; AJP 3.4.9, pp. ix, 1-5, 2-1, 3-3, 3-6.
22
Graham M. Longhurst: “The Evolution of Canadian Civ-
il-Military Cooperation (CIMIC),” Canadian Military Journal,
Winter 2006-2007, p. 61; AJP 3.4.9, pp. 2-1, 3-3.
23
Samuel P. Huntington, The Soldier and the State: The Theory
and Politics of Civil-Military Relations, Cambridge: Belknap
Press, 1957, pp. 80-85.
24
Florence Gaub: “Civil-Military Relations in the MENA:
between Fragility and Resilience,” Chaillot Papers: European
Union Institute for Security Studies, No. 139, October 2016, pp.
27, 32.
25
Ray A. Waller and Vincent T. Covello, Low Probability-High
Consequence Risk Analysis: Issues, Methods, and Case Studies,
New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 1984.
21