PBCBA BAR BULLETINS April 2020 | Page 13

PERSONAL INJURY CORNER UNDERTAKER DOCTRINE TED BABBITT Cascante v. 50 State Security Service, Inc., 45 Fla.L.Weekly D8a (Fla. 3d DCA 2019), was a security case in which a summary judgment had been rendered on behalf of the security service. The security service had a contract with the county to provide security for a parking garage for the South Miami Metro Rail and, thus, had undertaken the responsibility to provide that service by contract. Under Florida law, the Undertaker Doctrine was established in Clay Electric Co-op., Inc. v. Johnson, 873 So.2d 1182, 1886 (Fla. 2003): “Whenever one undertakes to provide a service to others, whether one does so gratuitously or by contract, the individual who undertakes to provide the service— i.e. the ‘undertaker’—thereby assumes a duty to act carefully and to not put others at an undue risk of harm.” Thus, the responsibility to ‘enact reasonable security measures’ was borne solely by the County.” Thus, the Court concluded that since the County, and only the County, had retained responsibility to determine virtually every aspect of the security plan, the fact that the plaintiff was injured by being attacked in the parking garage after hours was not the responsibility of the security agency but rather that of the County. A summary judgment was affirmed. NOTE: BECAUSE A NUMBER OF PEOPLE HAVE REQUESTED COPIES OF PAST ARTICLES, A COMPILATION OF THESE ARTICLES IS NOW AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS OF THE PALM BEACH COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION, FREE OF CHARGE, BY CALLING (561) 684-2500. LEADING PRACTICE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE 10% Discount for Bar Members In this case, the undertaking was based upon a contract and, as such, the extent of the undertaking is defined under the terms of the contract. McGee By & Through McGee v. Chalfant, 806 P2d 980, 985 (Kan. 1991): “Because the defendant’s duties to the plaintiff are usually based on the express terms of the contract between the parties, the contract itself is the best evidence of the exact nature and extent of those duties.” In analyzing the facts of this case, the Third District holds that not only is a court required to begin an analysis under these circumstances with the language of the contract, but if the language is unambiguous that is where the inquiry should end. In this case: “Here, under the unambiguous contractual terms, the County alone was charged with determining ‘the number of security officers, the shift schedule, and level of training required’. Indeed, as demonstrated by the record, for the duration of the contract, the County never strayed from its initial determination that the South Miami Metrorail parking garage only be staffed by a single roving guard from seven o’clock a.m. to seven o’clock p.m. … Theodore Babbitt AVAILABLE FOR MEDIATION After 50 plus years representing clients in complex personal injury and commercial litigation I cannot settle your case for you, but I can promise you I will bring to your mediation the same dedication, hard work and persistence that I have brought to representing clients throughout my career. Dispute Resolution Services at 1645 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 400, and throughout Florida M EDIATION G ROUP PBCBA BAR BULLETIN 13 To book a mediation with Mr. Babbitt, please call Norma Abreu at 561-533-7553. More details at uww-adr.com.