Partners Papers Issue 5 | Page 3

Interview with Russell Hutchinson Director, Quality Product Research We sat down with Russell Hutchinson, who is the Director of a company called Quality Product Research Limited, to find out about how they review different life insurance providers’ insurance policies. 3 Russell’s business is all about reviewing how life insurance policies work – to assess and compare the quality of insurance contracts and provide that information to advisers, so they can help make a decision on the best policy for you. They are researchers who are independent from insurance companies and advisers. 4 1 Financial advisers that specialise in insurance sales subscribe to our research. Some other industry organisations also use it. What is this research used for? Good insurance advisers review the insurance products available in the market and select policies most suitable for their clients. We think that is the heart of financial advice and we designed our research to help advisers assess which policies are most suitable for each individual client – customising our research report to each one based on age, gender, occupation, and exactly what policy options they choose to include. 5 How do you conduct your research? Where does your research go? Why is your research important? The insurance market has become too complex for clients or even most We gather all the policy documents and we chop them up into the most individual advisers to assess on their own. We have a team of seven staff important items. To help us work out which items are more important we and we also call on contract underwriters, medical experts, claims experts, develop claim models – a picture of what the typical claim looks like – and reinsurers, and actuaries to help us make our assessments. We think smart circulate those to experts in the industry for review – reinsurers, insurers, advisers use independent research to help inform their thinking – other medical and underwriting advisers, and insurance specialist financial advisers must either be trying to cover a lot of ground themselves, or advisers. We then look for the differences between policy wordings and make do without. rate each of the items according to the differences and the impact that 6 they may have on making a claim. 2 What do you consider when ranking products? Are products really that different? Yes! The worst trauma product, for example, offers only about half as much cover as the best. We have a four-factor analysis process which we apply to each of the items in a policy: Definition – which is how likely a claim is under the wordings. A good example is Melanoma, a type of skin cancer. Some companies will pay out a Trauma benefit on a Melanoma which is 1mm in depth, 7 others require it to be 1.5 mm. What makes them different? What varies is how easy it is to make a claim – so going back to trauma products, some insurers have definitions that mean that what your Doctor and Cardiologist calls a heart attack might not qualify. So for some products it has to be a much more serious heart attack than others. Another good example is how much is paid for income protection claims: Incidence – how likely this particular part of the policy there are three main differences in how payments are made and lots of is to be used. Continuing with the cancer minor variations – but the impact can be the difference between a big example, this has a very large weighting in our claim, a small claim, and no claim. model, as it is far more likely than rare diseases like CJD, and so it is more important to have a good definition. 8 So it’s not just about paying the lowest premium then? Frequency – how often this feature will pay out. Usually a claim is paid just once, but some benefits in We believe that some cover is better than none. So cheap premiums can medical insurance and income protection be a factor, but even if you are on a budget you can buy good quality insurance can be paid out several times – cover with the money you are spending. In fact, you need to make each of so some items can have a higher frequency those dollars work harder – so quality counts more than ever. in the model Amount – what is actually paid. So if a company puts limits on a payment or a reduced payment is made we include a reduced score for the limit in the model. 9 Where are Partners Life products ranked? We customise our research, so you need to get an individual report, but Partners Life policy wordings score very highly in our process – frequently We multiply these together to arrive at a score – the bigger the score the delivering the best definition possible. We have also seen Partners Life better. Some scores are negative – like the score for exclusions – because respond quickly to market changes and improve products when a desirable these take away from the value of a policy. change is made. partnerslife.co.nz