Factores situacionales en estudios de grupos focales
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. Londres: SAGE.
Hoddinott, P., & Pill, R. (1997). Qualitative research interviewing by
general practitioners: A personal view of the opportunities and the
pitfalls. Family Practice, 14(4), 307-312.
Hollander, J. A. (2004). The social contexts of focus groups. Journal of
Contemporary Ethnography, 33(5), 602-637.
Kälvemark, S., Höglund, A. T., Hansson, M. G., Westerholm, P., & Arnetz, B. (2004). Living with conflicts: Ethical dilemmas and moral
distress in the health care system. Social Science & Medicine, 58(6),
1075-1084.
King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. En C.
Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in
organizational research (pp. 25-270). Londres: SAGE.
King, N., Carroll, C., Newton, P., & Dornan, T. (2002). “You can’t cure it
so you have to endure it”: The experience of adaptation to diabetic
renal disease. Qualitative Health Research, 12(3), 329-346.
Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance
of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health &
Illness, 16(1), 103-121.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Londres: SAGE.
MacDougall, C. (1997). The devil’s advocate: A strategy to avoid groupthink and stimulate discussion in focus groups. Qualitative Health
Research, 7(4), 532-541.
Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and
guidelines. The L ancet, 358(9280), 483-488.
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2011). Evidence-based practice
in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (2a ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
Paradigmas, jul.-dic., 2014, Vol. 6, No. 2, 87-127
| 125