PALESTINE Memories of 1948 - Photographs of Jerusalem | Page 76
1. According to sources. See Ilan Pappé, The
Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, Oxford, One-
world Publications, 2006.
2. In October 1948, the repercussions from
the Israeli army’s Operation Yo’av caused the
population of the whole area to the west of He-
bron to flee. At Al Dawayima, the tanks rolled
into the town on Friday October 29, 1948. The
soldiers killed the people in their houses, in the
streets and even in the mosques, and then dec-
imated the 35 families found hiding in caves
near to the village.
3. The mukhtar is chosen by the council to rep-
resent his village or his neighbourhood at coun-
cil, and to fulfil the role of registrar (he records
births and deaths and so on).
4. Rushdieh’s uncle saw them on the three roads
that connected Al Dawayima to the neighbour-
ing villages of Qubayba, Beit Jibrin and Ma-
fkhar, as he later testified to the United Nations.
5. Ilan Pappé, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine,
Oxford, Oneworld Publications, 2006. The
author mentions the terms under which the
Daleth Plan was enacted on March 10, 1948.
6. An eyewitness who survived the massacre
later reported this to the mukhtar.
7. See Yoella Har-Shefi, “Another Deir Yas-
in?” Journal of Palestine Studies, University of
California Press & Institute for Palestinian
Studies (Special Issue: The Palestinians in Is-
rael and the Occupied Territories), vol. 14, n°.
2, Winter 1985, pp. 207–212. In 1948, the
mukhtar, Hassan Mahmoud Hudeib, gave
an interview to Yoella Har-Shefi, a journalist
working for the Israeli daily newspaper Hada-
shot, and together they went to the site of the
massacre. In order to verify the old Palestinian
man’s story Yoella returned to the spot to do
some exploratory digging, and found human
bones. She stopped searching, out of respect for
the dead: the mukhtar had spoken the truth.
8. See the book by Walid Khalidi, All That
Remains: The Palestinian Villages Occupied and
Depopulated by Israel in 1948, Washington
DC, 1992. Using this book as a reference, the
Israeli NGO Zochrot catalogued the villag-
es that were abandoned in 1948 after having
been attacked by Israeli forces. Qubayba had a
population of 1230 and was probably attacked
either by the Giva’ati unit or Har’el (Palmach).
The attack caused the entire population to flee.
9. Beit Jibrin is a particular case, given its stra-
tegic position on the front line between Israeli
and Egyptian forces in 1948. The First Battal-
ion of the Egyptian army had taken up posi-
tions inside the village. According to the New
York Times correspondent, in May 1948 thou-
sands of the residents of Jaffa had fled towards
Hebron and many had stayed and settled in this
village. Like Qubayba, Beit Jibrin was occupied
during Operation Yo’av. The aim of the opera-
tion, together with Operation ha-Har, was to
74
Memories of 1948
occupy the whole of the south of the Jerusalem
corridor after October 18, 1948, according to
the Israeli archives quoted by Zochrot.
10. Until the early twentieth century, the
keffiyah was the traditional headdress of the
Bedouin, while the peasant farmers wore a
scarf tied into a turban on their heads (which
they still do in Egypt today). But in the 1930s,
the peasants started to use it during guerrilla
activities against Zionist groups and against
the French in Syria. Subsequently, the keffiyah
completely replaced the turban.
11. Those responsible for the massacre at Al
Dawayima were the 89th battalion, command-
ed by the founder of the Palmach, General
Yitzhaq Sadeh. See the article by Yair Auron,
“Breaking the Silence: The Poem That Exposed
Israeli War Crimes in 1948”, Haaretz, March
18, 2016, for the condemnation of the mas-
sacres by the Minister of Agriculture Aharon
Zisling and the expressions of remorse of a few
soldiers.
12. According to the Partition Plan drawn up
by the United Nations in November 1947, He-
bron was part of the Palestinian territory.
13. Later on, the mukhtar handed the list in
to Ibrahim Qarishan, the Jordanian military
governor of Hebron.
14. The historian Ilan Pappé cross-referenced
several sources and concluded that 176 people
died in the mosque, and 426 men, women and
children were shot dead. The mukhtar’s state-
ment, given under oath to the United Nations
Commission for Conciliation in Palestine,
gave the figures as 455 people, of whom 280
were men. To this figure must be added those
who came from neighbouring villages to seek
refuge in Al Dawayima, bringing the total to
560 dead.
15. The Arabic name for Jericho is Ariha.
16. The Unccp representative presented his
report to the Arab Refugee Congress in Ramal-
lah. The idea of setting up the Unccp was put
forward by Count Folke Bernadotte, a Swedish
diplomat who had been nominated by the UN
Security Council as mediator in the Arab-Israeli
conflict. After he was assassinated in September
1948, the UN General Assembly voted to set
up the Commission, based on Resolution 194
of December 11, 1948. Its mission was to take
on the conciliation role of the UN mediator.
The Unccp is composed of three members of
the UN General Assembly: the USA, France
and Turkey. The record of the interview with
Mukhtar Hudeib is available on the website
of the online magazine Mondoweiss at http://
mondoweiss.net/2016/02/the-mukhtars-sworn-
testimony-more-on-the-dawaymeh-massacre/
17. On April 9, 1948, 254 women, children
and old people were murdered by Zionist
groups at Deir Yasin, a Palestinian village near
Jerusalem (according to figures given by the
Red Cross). This massacre took place while Pal-
estine was still under British rule, and it played
an extremely important psychological role in
the Palestinian exodus. The official Zionist ad-
ministration denied all responsibility.
18. In 1955, Amatzya, a moshav (an Israeli agri-
cultural cooperative, made up of an association
of several individual farms), was established on
the site Al Dawayima. Today an Israeli settle-
ment has been built over part of the ruins of Al
Dawayima. In 2010, bulldozers began levelling
the ground to build houses for orthodox Jew-
ish families which had been evacuated in 2005
from Gush Katif in the Gaza strip.
19. The testimony given by Mukhtar Hudeib
was corroborated by that of an Israeli soldier
who witnessed the massacre. He wrote a de-
tailed letter to Eliezer Peri, the editor of the
Israeli newspaper Al HaMishmar, on Novem-
ber 8, 1948, in other words just ten days after
the event, but his letter was not published. In
it he explains how, at Al Dawayima, men who
were educated and cultured became murders.
He blames this on the logic of destruction and
expulsion that was instilled in their brains, jus-
tifying the brutality of the massacre (children’s
skulls smashed, women raped and burned alive
in their houses…) and making light of the col-
lective murder of the Palestinians. See http://
mondoweiss.net/2016/02/barbarism-by-an-ed-
ucated-and-cultured-people-dawayima-mas-
sacre-was-worse-than-deir-yassin/ The letter
was eventually published in the Israeli daily
newspaper Haaretz in an article by historian
Yair Auron, on February 5, 2016, 68 years later.
According to Auron there were many eyewit-
nesses, but none of the Israeli soldiers who took
part in the massacre were ever tried, in spite
of the overwhelming evidence. They were all
granted amnesty in February 1949. The Israeli
writer Amos Keinan, who also participated in
the massacre, confirmed the facts in an inter-
view that he gave towards the end of the 1990s
to Palestinian actor and cinematographer Mu-
hammad Bakri for his documentary 1948.
20. According to Ilan Pappé, The Ethnic
Cleansing of Palestine, Oxford, Oneworld Pub-
lications, 2006, p. 196, the United Nations
report of June 14, 1949, said: ‘The reason why
so little is known about the massacre which, in
many respects, was more brutal than the Deir
Yasin massacre, is because the Arab Legion (the
army in control of that area) feared that if the
news was allowed to spread, it would have the
same effect on the moral of the peasantry that
Deir Yasin had, namely to cause another flow
of Arab refugees.’
21. After May 1948, David Ben-Gurion inte-
grated the Zionist militias into the body of the
Israeli Defence Forces. He was therefore direct-
ly responsible for them from that point on, and
could no longer say that he opposed the actions