[ O U T S O U R C E D T R A D I N G S U R V E Y ]
Saxo
Saxo |
2025 |
2024 |
2023 |
Global |
Difference to Global |
Coverage |
5.75 |
- |
- |
6.25 |
-0.50 |
Execution |
5.33 |
- |
- |
6.20 |
-0.86 |
Operations and Post-Trade |
5.50 |
- |
- |
6.19 |
-0.69 |
Relationship Management |
6.00 |
- |
- |
6.15 |
-0.15 |
Trade Decision Support |
- |
- |
- |
6.00 |
N / A |
IPO Process and Allocations |
N / A |
|
|
5.25 |
N / A |
Onboarding |
4.67 |
- |
- |
5.98 |
-1.32 |
Client Services |
6.00 |
- |
- |
6.15 |
-0.15 |
Cost vs Value |
5.25 |
- |
- |
5.99 |
-0.74 |
Average |
5.50 |
- |
- |
6.02 |
-0.61 |
new entrant to our survey
A this year with a relatively small sample size, Saxo qualifies for a write-up and posts an average overall score of 5.50- firmly in the Good range. The provider reports to have handled 58 million trades, with every intention to build on this momentum. With the ever-evolving technology and capabilities, Saxo said it is“ committed to keeping pace with these advancements” and looking to gain scale in the marketplace. Two areas where this provider receives solid ratings are Relationship Management( 6.00) and Client Services( 6.00). Participants highlighted several key factors that contributed to Saxo’ s Very Good rating for Relationship Management. These included consistent daily contact from both front- and back-office teams, strong out-of-hours support, and the value of its annual provider review. Client Services( 6.00) also benefits from a range of contributing factors: uptime and connectivity
Chart 1
offered by this provider, multiasset execution capabilities, and regulatory support. When asked which categories matter most when selecting a provider, Client Services and Relationship Management were the top priorities for Saxo’ s clients. Onboarding( 4.67) receives the lowest rating amongst the nine categories reviewed, sitting 132 basis points below the global average. Approximately two-thirds of clients rate this category as Good, with the remaining rating it as Satisfactory. In terms of client breakdown, there is a fairly even split between the two AUM ranges, while geographically, respondents are based in the UK and Guernsey. Over a third of participants rate the overall service offered by this provider as Excellent or Very Good, and approximately half of respondents would recommend the provider to their peers within the industry.
2025 // Outsourced Trading Handbook // 39