[ O U T S O U R C E D T R A D I N G S U R V E Y ]
Chart 2 Chart 2
to their peers within the industry. When asked if they had considered changing provider, 55 % report“ no”- with the remainder choosing to skip this question. Looking forward Ediphy believes that“ T + 1 continues to be a big catalyst for buy-sides looking to outsource their fixed income execution.” On a broader spectrum, the focus on cost and consolidation continues to be key considerations, something which the provider feels makes them“ particularly attractive”. In fact, one client comments,“ they provide a much-needed service at a very manageable cost, in both fees and execution”. Despite increased competition within the industry, with the recent changes and more“ techfocused contenders” emerging, Ediphy believes there are plenty of“ interesting opportunities for [ them ] as well”.
Client Preference 1 Execution 2 Operation and Post-Trade 3 Cost Versus Value for Money 4 Coverage 5 Service Level Factors 6 Client Service and Relationship
Management 7 Trade Decision Support 8 Onboarding 9 IPO Process and Allocations
“ They provide a much-needed service at a very manageable cost, in both fees and execution”.
2025 // Outsourced Trading Handbook // 27