Outlook English - Print Subscribers Copy Outlook English, 18 June 2018 | Page 30
U NT RUTH PREVAILS
ubious operators and sent to the city’s
d
eateries. Amid an outrage, police identi-
fied and arrested one of the kingpins, a
man named Bishu, who is now being
called “mangsho (meat) Bishu”.
Though some of the allegations were
true, the distribution of such meat was
limited. But that did not stop huge
numbers of consumers from boycotting
chicken and meat. Abdur Rezzak Mollah,
West Bengal minister in charge of the
department of food processing indus-
tries, said that while the rumours could
indeed be based on some real occur-
rences, the magnitude of public panic or
outrage was far overplayed.
“No one can claim that illegal busi-
nesses, including those which are
involved in fake food production, are
not burgeoning not just in West Bengal
or the rest of the country but across the
world,” says Rezzak. “However, to allow
these stray incidents to have such an
impact as to cripple normal life is a
matter of concern.” Rezzak does not just
hold fake news sites on social media
responsible for spreading paranoia but
even mainstream media , which shows
news without checking the sources.
B
EVERAGES including colas of
multinational brands have been at
the receiving end of numerous
smear campaigns, allegedly by rival
companies. Though the health hazards
of aerated drinks are widely accepted, a
recent video which went viral on
WhatsApp showed two popular drinks
using “bathroom-cleaning chemicals”
as an ingredient. The video sparked
panic among a section of consumers.
The rumour was eventually contained,
but not before it could do some damage.
Over the last few years, rumours and
fake news with political and religious
colour have been circulating almost on
a daily basis, pitting communities or
caste groups against each other. Such
has been the menace that the govern-
ment is now contemplating stricter laws
to clamp down on fake news. In India,
which is reportedly one of the world’s
biggest WhatsApp’s markets, the spread
of rumour viruses is far reaching and it
seems to be mutating, appearing cease-
lessly in various avatars.
In the latest instance, it has sprung up
around the Nipah virus which has
claimed several lives in Kerala. When
the disease struck the state late in May,
30 OUTLOOK 18 June 2018
HYDERABAD Police chief
after the recent l ynchings,
asks people not to believe in
social media rumours
MEMORIES OF HAZE
Bangalore 2012
This was one of the early episodes of chaos
induced through social media. Messages
claiming that people, largely students, from
the Northeast were being targeted in
Bangalore by locals were circulated via
social media, still at a somewhat nascent
stage. What followed was a mass exodus
attempt by people from Northeastern
states with thousands rushing to the
railway station to flee the virtually
created hostile vibe.
Muzaffarnagar 2013
The main spark of the 2013 communal riots
in Muzzafarnagar was a stray WhatsApp
video. The video, most likely from a remote
area of Pakistan, showed a mob brutally
beating two men. It was shared widely to
spread anger against a community. The
state government had to intervene and clear
the air around the falsely attributed video,
but the venom had been spread by then.
Jharkhand 2017
Last year, another WhatsApp scare around
‘child-kidnapping’ in Jharkhand resulted in
the lynching of seven people.
a fresh round of scare-mongering
infected the Internet. The initial
onslaught of advisory messages forbid
the public from partaking of ripe fruits
which could have been bitten by bats,
which were initially thought to be the
carriers of the virus, along with pigs. But
at a national level, the messages soon
became more offensive, advocating as
they did, the ostracisation of Kerala and
its residents. The state administration
had to issue reassurances that the
outbreak had been contained and
managed to dispel fears.
Within Kerala itself, another cause for
concern for the administration were the
hate rumours that were flooding the
inboxes of the state’s users—that
migrant workers from Bangladesh and
other states had brought the Nipah virus
to the state. Worried that its 40-lakh
migrant
labour workforce would be
targeted, the administration had to step
in to dispel the xenophobic myths. This
it is not the first time that Kerala’s
migrant labour force had been the sub-
ject of rumours. In October 2017, hun-
dreds of migrant labourers fled Kerala
when rumours floated that their lives
were in danger. Fake messages circu-
lated on WhatsApp said that a m
igrant
labourer from West Bengal was beaten
to death in the state while others said
that Hindi-speaking people were being
attacked by locals. That was enough for
this floating, vulnerable population to
panic and an exodus began. Newspapers
reports say that many of the labourers
didn’t even c ollect their wages, they just
fled the state without informing their
employers. Chief minister Pinarayi
Vijayan had to step in to condemn the
rumours. Vijayan called the rumour
mongers “mad” for spreading the cruel
messages. His choice of word was not
without a reason.
When Kerala was in the vortex of a
crisis after Cyclone Ockhi grazed the
coast last year, another rumour hit.
Hundreds of fishermen out at sea had
gone missing. As the state struggled
with the rescue efforts, a WhatsApp
message claimed that nearly 60 fisher-
men were rescued by a Japanese mer-
chant ship that was heading towards
Vizhinjam port. As the state rejoiced
following the news, relatives of the
missing fishermen took taxis and
rushed to the port to receive them while
ambulances were at the ready to rush
the rescued to the hospital. But there
was no Japanese ship nor any rescued
fishermen at the port, causing anger
among the relatives and huge embar-
rassment to the state government. Even
the district collector of Thiruvanan-
thapuram and the fisheries minister
were taken in by the fake messages. O