Outlook English - Print Subscribers Copy Outlook English, 09 July 2018 | Page 22

B I T I N G BUL L ETS which it throws around the event and needs to be challenged. which ordinary protest, even by suffering victims, lacks. In Death as murder cannot be presented as death by execution. fact, one realises that truth and objectivity get ritually sepa­ The obscenity begins there. Making the deaths inevitable rated. Objectivity is a set of sanitised rituals that groups have and bureaucratic gives it anonymity, a technocratic inevita­ to construct to claim expertise and authenticity; NGOs have bility. Narrative restores life to each body. Statistics has to be to work hard to challenge the finality of government diktats. A redeemed though biography. ‘Ten dead’ creates an obscenity scream is not enough; it has to be couched in footnotes. of indifference that only storytelling and writing can redeem. Truth also becomes a form of musical chairs as different nar­ Both power and the narratives of power have a sense of fait ratives are played out. Truth can be the inadvertent casualty of accompli. Media as a narrative of power determines the time the choice of time in a narrative. Does the report begin with the of an event. Within a day or two, the media forces a sense of protest as an explosion of civil society on the streets, or does normalcy on narrative. It wants to speed up time, convey a one talk of the months of disquiet and waiting, the symptoms of sense of closure. One senses this after the shootings. It is not ill health earlier? Does truth become truth only in the structure pain or memory that the media focuses on, but on whether of public space? The question then is what is the responsibility shops are open--a signal of normalcy. and role of writing in this context? How does one talk of justice As one walks through Thoothukudi, violence is almost bot­ in this environment, realising that Vedanta attracts more pro­ anical in its diversity. How do we present the various strands tests in London than in the margins called Thoothukudi? The media itself realises that standard narratives cannot go of violence around the protests? People dying of mysterious ailments. The bureaucracies’ indifference. Vendanta’s cal­ beyond conventional traffic signals of what is permissible or acceptable narratives as a first report. Let us call a FMR (first lousness. The burning of buses and vehicles as a warzone. media report) to spoof it along first information report (FIR). The police shooting. The violence of narratives. How does one grade them, locate them? How does one collate or col­ One tactic is to produce a bland first report citing all sides, lage indifference, callousness, erasure, brutality, cold-blood­ and then angle the next day’s headlines, as The New Indian edness, vandalism or even, the slow Express did. So, Day I reads that the shooting ruthlessness of environmental violence? was inevitable. Day II headlines report the SP The Challenge of Normalcy and the collector have been shunted. The The question is what is normalcy when the word ‘shunted’ virtually hints that the direc­ Sterlite battle has been going on for 14 tion of narrative has changed, that Day 1 was months. Is normalcy merely a right to res­ume just a prelude to Day II, as the plot thickened. operations for Sterlite, or the basic resump­ The second, more effective, tactic is to make tion of law and order, with politicians playing narrative and visual look discordant. One ins­ humanitarian and promising doles to every erts a picture of an official sniper/shooter in a family whose member has been shot? The police car; suddenly, the suspicions of pro­ language of normalcy has a quaint quality testors look more substantial. when the two government officers a re desig­ The most lethal of the tactics of juxtaposi­ In Thoothukudi, nated as ambassadors to visit hospitals and tion is probably the nostalgia narrative used violence is almost interact with the public. There is a sense that by The Times of India. The paper invited V.A. botanical. How to Thoothukudi has been alien or hostile terri­ Ravi Kumar, a retired IPS officer, to talk of present its variety? tory for a week. They were even styled as ‘lis­ crowd control in his time. As he lists out the teners’. Maybe, it emphasises the fact that precautionary tactics, one realises the narra­ The deaths from tive is an indictment of the current firing. illnesses, the apathy, this government needs a hearing aid when it comes to reacting with the public. When Ravi Kumar says, “firing is an act of protests, shooting.... Yet, a return to normalcy is not like putting cowardice” and maintains “firing should be back a piece of plumbing. It is a complex rite of avoided at any cost and should be last resort”, one realises that these are not just pearls of nostalgic wisdom, passage which demands an unravelling of covert and formal ope­rations. If protest is a right of citizenship, the people of but an indirect indictment of police action in Thoothukudi. Thoothukudi are not quite citizens. Pollution is seen as normal The newspaper becomes an art form of multiple narratives, a but protest is seen as polluting the body politic. The govern­ set of juxtaposition which slowly lets the reader create his ment, in fact, is deploying police officers to show that own flexible interpretation that not all is right with the world everything followed procedure. Families of deceased are forced of Thoothukudi. The newspaper reports have to be fragmen­ to sign statements. Normalcy almost seems a PRO operation, a tary, so the reader can build his version of the whole. quick fix to cover up the lack of governance. The emphasis is Decoding the lie not on truth but on law and order. The headlines read ‘On the Telling truth to power is more complex than it first seems. road to recovery’. Yet, as one ploughs through the details, the How do you capture the integrity of the whole, while retain­ headline turns ironic. Credibility and trust are deeper than nor­ ing justice for one part? One has to capture the singularity of malcy. In fact, the word ‘normalcy’ in the aftermath of disasters the event, while retaining a sense of the general. Around has become obscene and hypocritical, a set of props to convince Thoothukudi, how does one capture the nature of death? the world that the regime is in control. O Death as a demographic fact, as number, reads differently. Death as execution from a sniper’s bullet sounds inevitable, (Visvanathan was part of the People’s Watch Team but death as atrocity may not be necessary. The obscenity investigating the violence at Thoothukudi, which was led by might be in the official definition of it, the garb of necessity Henri Trphagne and Nityanand Jayaram) 22 OUTLOOK 9 July 2018