Odyssey Magazine Issue 1, 2016 | Page 22

1 April, 2017. The SAHPRA mandate has been extended to include the regulation of CAMs. The lack of a specific definition of CAMs could, however, result in 'some controversy', says Fels. underground.' Fels stresses that the HPA has been requesting regulations for more than 30 years, but insists that these need to be CAMs-appropriate, fair and transparent. 'The DoH had inserted a definition of CAMs into Applying allopathic standards to dietary and natural the draft Amendment Bill which was passed on to the health supplements is, he says, 'like applying airbus rules Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Health,' he adds. to bicycles'. 'But, just prior to this Bill being signed into law, the CAMs 'Ideally, CAMs should have its own directorate/registrar definition was removed. We are still waiting for the final and this is what we intend to fight for under SAHPRA,' he CAMs Regulations, containing a revised definition of CAMs.' concludes. According to Fels there are two conflicting views relating It is now an open question as to whether the to the anticipated publication of the CAMs regulations. One government, and in specific the bureaucrats in the DoH view is that any CAMs regulations published would once who have been driving the 'CAMs and TAMs are the same again be ultra vires and unconstitutional, as Act 101 is as medical drugs agenda', see that not only is their new now devoid of a definition of CAMs, thus removing the law fatally flawed, but that they are also destroying a legislative basis for CAMs regulations. once-thriving domestic and job-creating industry, as well be ready for a full-blooded fight if you are one of those who believes it is your right, and not that of the government, to decide on what medicines, or supplements or herbs or whatever else you choose, to put in your body This is the view held by the TNHA, the African Traditional Healers' leadership with whom Odyssey Magazine has spoken, representing over half of all registered traditional healers, and many independent players in the SA CAMs industry. The other view, says Fels, could claim that the definition of a medicine in the Act is all-embracing and sufficiently broad to include CAMs – thus empowering the M