Occupational Therapy News OTnews May 2020 | Page 29
COVID-19 FEATURE
prioritised patients into three groups: those who were ‘at risk’ and
needed face-to-face contact; those at ‘medium risk’ who could be
managed with telephone follow ups; and the ‘low risk’ category that
could be put on hold for intervention.
The ‘at risk’ group includes those who, if left, would have a
higher risk of a negative outcome compared with not visiting the
hospital for input. This includes acute urgent trauma that cannot be
safely immobilised by cast, such as tendon repairs if immobilisation
is not appropriate for the necessary four-week immobilisation
period.
We also included as a priority on our waiting list new
arthrogryposis patients that require splinting and can then be sent
home with the relevant information to continue until the pressures
and concerns of COVID-19 reduce.
Infection control and new ways of working
The therapy department was shut down to prevent the spread of
the virus. This meant that there was no waiting area and no direct
access to the reception.
Patients identified as still needing a face-to-face review
went through a rigorous screening process, both before their
appointment and on the day of the appointment, to ensure they
were not presenting with symptoms.
Patients that were seen face to face were expected to only bring
one member of their family with them. Infection control measures
were implemented throughout each consultation to protect both
patient and therapist.
This included the use of appropriate personal protection
equipment (PPE) which made interaction with our patients, in
particular smaller children, very different as a visible barrier was now
in place between patient and professional; something we try hard to
break down when treating patients.
Patients that could be managed over the telephone were
contacted, screened and if appropriate offered advice. This included
trauma patients coming to the end of their therapy programme
and congenital patients with on-going regular input with regards to
routine splint checks, due an imminent review, for example known
arthrogryposis patients, radial hemimelia and known cerebral palsy
patients.
Telephone check-ups were centred around their progress and
to advise on things such as home exercise programmes and splint
weaning. This provided parents with the opportunity to discuss
any concerns they might have without having to enter the hospital
environment and allowing patients and their families to abide to
government self-isolation stipulations.
Home exercise programmes were sent out by post, where
necessary, with photographs and videos used as needed, if
possible.
Finally, other patients were identified as non urgent and could
be seen in six months’ time or discharged. This cohort of patients
included congenital patients already on a longstanding and
established therapy programme that are low risk from reduced
face-to-face occupational therapy intervention.
RCOT Specialist Section – Children, Young
People and Families
We promote high standards of professional practice within
children's occupational therapy and, together with our
members, continue to develop an evidence base for the
profession. Our specialist section represents occupational
therapists working with children, young people and their
families in a wide range of settings including:
• Acute hospitals
• Child and Adolescent Mental Heath Services (CAMHS)
• Children's centres
• Community services
• Education/schools
• Independent practice
• Learning disability services
• Local authority health and social care
• Wheelchair services
• The voluntary sector
For general enquiries please email: [email protected]
or visit: www.rcot.co.uk/about-us/specialist-sections/
children-young-people-and-families-rcot-ss
New congenital patient reviews for activities of daily living, where
possible, were transferring to local community services to reduce
the impact on the hospital service once normal protocol is re-
instated.
Hand therapy relies heavily on face to face, tactile assessments
of the hand. As occupational therapists our clinical reasoning and
skills were stretched to adapt to new way of working. Patients
and their parents were understanding towards the limitations now
placed on our service and were helpful in providing us with verbal
feedback on patient progress, as well as the patient themselves.
As a result of this global pandemic, a department we have been
able to reflect on how our service is run and the changes we can
carry forward from this new way of working.
It has helped us to streamline our service as a whole and
review our waiting list in order to make the service more efficient
and available to the patients that need it the most. It has also
helped us as autonomous practitioners redefine how we help our
patients to show that no matter what, we are still here for them
and to provide them with reassurance and guidance when still
needed.
Despite the face-to-face restriction, the Hand and Upper Limb
Service still endeavoured to work as a team, exploring new ways
of virtual consultations, email, telephone and WhatsApp groups, to
remain in communication with one another, while trying to protect
both patients and staff from the spread of the virus.
Kristabel Ewers, senior occupational therapist, and Kiri Irani,
advanced occupational therapists, Hand and Upper Limb Service,
Birmingham Children’s Hospital, email: [email protected]
OTnews May 2020 29