Observing Memories Issue 3 | Page 45

the Republic have underlined the bond that unites institutional memory. The celebration of the 70th the Risorgimento (the birth of the national state in anniversary of the Italy’s liberation in 2015 showed, the nineteenth century) to the First World War and if anything, some signs that this memory is being to the Resistance, which is traditionally described recovered, thanks to the committed support of the as “the second Risorgimento”. And they have new president Sergio Mattarella. In such context, consistently stressed the European significance of an analogy can be noticed with the relaunch of the the Resistance, identifying the foundation of today’s memory of the Resistance that took place in France, united Europe in the struggle against Nazism and where in July 2013 the Assemblée Nationale voted to Fascism waged by Italy and the other populations establish a National Resistance Day. of the continent. From this European perspective, All the main contemporary Italian public we should also underline President Napolitano’s memories (the Resistance, the Shoah, the foibe) attempts since 2010 to transform the foibe from remain linked to the experience of the Second World a nationalist memory into a memory of European War. With the demise of the parties that created reconciliation between Italy, Slovenia and Croatia, the now disappeared First Republic, their political based on the mutual recognition of wrongs that the cultures, rooted in anti-Fascism, faded away. parties have historically inflicted on each other and Now Italians citizens tend to collectively identify on a fruitful future collaboration inside the European themselves as victims - either at the hands of the Union. This policy has helped to avert a potentially Nazis or at the hands of the Yugoslavs. At the same dangerous political confrontation between Italy time, they identify themselves as the “righteous” and its eastern neighbours, marked over the years and cultivate the memory of the “good Italians” by diplomatic crises and by the neo-irredentist who helped the peJews. A more conscious memory, positions of the Italian right. Italian nationalists one more aware of the events of the past and better were keen to redefine the territorial agreements equipped to deal with the dark pages of the history of signed by Italy and Yugoslavia in 1975, claiming that a country that was the cradle of Fascism in Europe, the dissolution of the Yugoslav Federation rendered is still struggling to make its way. them invalid. Even the Presidents of the German Republic’s numerous visits made in Italy to the sites of the Nazi massacres were a clear sign of a process of (“bilateral”) reconciliation in the name of their common EU membership. In other words, Italy since the 1990s represents a particularly interesting case with reference to the changes in public narratives and cultures of memory. The new coordinates of European memory promoted by the EU institutions in Brussels – the memory of the Shoah and the anti-totalitarian paradigm – have gained considerable ground inside the Italian public opinion. The memory of the Resistance, bedrock of the First Republic, came under great pressure from two sides: competition from the Shoah on the one hand, and the antagonistic memory of the foibe on the other. Thanks to the steadfastness of the country’s presidents, the memory of the Resistance has not been undermined or replaced and has remained a fundamental pillar in the national EUROPE INSIGHT 43