Observing Memories Issue 2 | Page 17

an acceptance on the armed left of authoritarian a result, becoming “serial assassins.” He calls for leadership and its abuses of power. He uses as ending the silence about the left’s involvement examples the executions ordered by the leaders of in atrocities, “truth and justice should be for the movement of two rank and file members (Adofo everyone.” Rotblat “Pupi” and Bernardo Groswald). Jouvé takes Del Barco is not silenced. A deep dialogic responsibility for witnessing those acts and failing to conflict erupted instead. For some the issues that speak out against them. He thus became, in his view, Jouvé and del Barco exposed were not new. As one an accomplice to murder. His confessional text calls commentator states, “Nothing said is new to me; for language, speaking out and asking questions, as a but it has a particular intensity.” For others what political weapon: “culture is a web of conversations… emerged was “previously silenced themes and more than defining ourselves, we need to ask good problems.” The aim of the magazine, and those who questions…if not, we will continue to repeat the confessed, to generate debate and contention over same mistakes.” the past within the left succeeded on the pages of His words begin a dialogue. Oscar del Barco wrote a letter stating that Jouvé’s interview “moved” him to become conscious, albeit very late, of the subsequent issues of the same magazine and in other news outlets. On the positive side, those who supported Jouvé serious tragedy within the EGP. He says, that “by and del Barco mentioned how their confessions supporting the activities of this group, I was as played a role in presenting a more nuanced responsible as the murderers.” He goes on to say, version of the past that fell in between the existing “There is no explanation that makes us innocent.” narratives of the left as in the two devils theory or a There are not causes or ideas that remove our guilt. devils-angels theory. The confessions emphasized He calls on everyone to accept the command “thou the danger when the movements’ goals and its shall not kill,” to recognize that all human beings actions are disconnected and inconsistent. These are sacred, that no one, no matter what they did, supporters further embraced a commitment to the should be killed. He refers to the left around the commandment “thou shalt not kill” on the left and world (Russia, Romania, Yugoslavia, China, Korea, the right to end the legacy of violence as a way to do Cuba), as failing to uphold this command, and, as politics. Finally, these supporters identified the value Deep Article 15