Observing Memories Issue 2 | Page 53

Horst Hoheisel, Die Tore der Deutschen, 1997, lighting display on the Brandenburg Gate | Horst Hoheisel A few years before in 1994/95, I submitted the following concept for the competition to design the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe: destroying the Brandenburg Gate, grinding it to dust and scattering the remains onto the proposed memorial site. The site would be covered with granite plates, as are typical on the pavements of Berlin. Would the German people sacrifice their national symbol to be a Holocaust memorial? Would they bear the void of these two places: instead of a national monument to the victims, simply an empty space; instead of an immense field of stelae, an empty accessible site with the pulverised remains of the Brandenburg Gate, the national symbol of the nation of the perpetrators? It goes without saying that I was eliminated from the competition in the first round of judging. However, the idea prevailed more and more as a radical alternative to all the suggested new memorial structures and attracted international attention. James E. Young wrote: “Rather than commemorating the destruction of a people with yet another constructed edifice, Hoheisel would mark destruction with destruction. Rather than filling in the void left by a murdered people with a positive form, the artist would carve out an empty space in Berlin by which to recall a now absent people” (2). The idea of grinding the Brandenburg Gate to dust as the Holocaust Memorial has spread like a rumour to reach present-day city tours. Guides in tour buses passing the Brandenburg Gate explain that a “crazy artist” once wanted to demolish it and spread its remains on the site where the Field of Stelae currently stands as the Holocaust Memorial. overview 51