Nursing Review Issue 4 | Jul-Aug 2017 | Page 13

specialty focus The numbers of RANs coming through that they had to orientate was just completely burning them out. The other key part was trying to establish a more stable workforce, and that’s very difficult with a turnover rate like that, and it’s very difficult to really reduce levels of occupational stress when you have such a turnover rate and an unstable workforce like that. One of the other major areas was trying to reduce the sense of isolation by increasing the use of internet in all the accommodation. In the Territory health department, there is internet available in the clinic but not in most of the accommodation, which is not ideal. There is a program now to increase the internet access in accommodation where people can email, video conference or FaceTime with friends and families, as well as accessing the internet for educational purposes and for professional development. I think another major area was to try to increase the number of permanent relievers. The relievers that are employed by the health department go back to the same communities, so it’s not a new person all the time and decreases the need for that orientation of everybody that comes through. There have been some situations where one nurse might be in the clinic and has seen 136 RANs go through the clinic in 12 months and has had to orientate each of them. The other area was trying to increase the education and performance of managers, to require managers to do some education around management. With the violence and safety, the main strategy was to increase the use of second responders, and since that horrible murder of a RAN in South Australia, it has become a real issue, the Northern Territory health department has made it mandatory now for RANs – if they go out on call at night – to be escorted with a second responder. Some of the interventions laid out weren’t implemented in the 12-month study timeframe. What obstacles were there in terms of implementation? The main obstacles were the time period, for one. For real organisational change, the literature suggests you need at least three years, and we ran the work groups and tried to make changes within 12 months, which probably wasn’t realistic. We had found even though the project is technically finished, a lot of the interventions are still happening, so they’re still being implemented within the health department. We do hope to be able to repeat this survey in a couple of years’ time and see what the changes have been. The other main area is the unstable workforce – it’s a bit of a vicious circle. Until we can do something about stabilising the workforce a little bit and reducing the turnover, it makes it very difficult to introduce most of the other interventions and actually reduce the stress. I’m not sure exactly how that’s going to happen. The Commonwealth government’s intervention in the Northern Territory in Aboriginal communities occurred around the same time as the start of this project, before we did the interventions, and really created a limitation as to what we could do. They also put quite a bit of money into agency staff to try and increase the number of nurses from the east coast coming to remote Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory. We need those people, but they didn’t put money or strategies into developing a more semi-permanent workforce. The use of agency staff has increased dramatically in the Northern Territory and has greatly increased the turnover rate. There were some unexpected consequences around the intervention that wasn’t positive for the workforce. At the moment, it’s still a major issue that it’s easier and often more financially rewarding to work for an agency than it is to work for a health department. That’s partly why the turnover rate is so high. Until we can bring down that turnover rate, I don’t think there’s very much we can do with really reducing stress levels, but we have been able to have some real wins on the board with this project. One of the things we identified was that there were a number of single nurse clinics, particularly in Central Australia, and the Northern Territory government had already made the decision to reduce those, or even get rid of single nurse posts. I think there’s no single nurse post left in Central Australia. Through this project, we managed to bring in better orientation and education. The other thing that’s needed to try and develop a more permanent workforce, or semi-permanent, is a career structure for RANs, which the Northern Territory government has done. There are areas where nurses can come in at a lower level, a Level 2 or a Level 3, and not be expected to go on calls straight away and have an educational process that would lead them to a Level 4, which is the normal level of RANs. So it allows nurses to be learners, which in the old structure really wasn’t there. People were expected to hit the ground running and know everything, which was totally unrealistic. Moving forward, what would you say are some of the high priority changes that need to be implemented across all remote health centres to start to reduce occupational stress and improve the safety of RANs? One of them is to try and reduce the turnover rate. I think there has to be some creative strategies developed to make it a good option to work for a health department rather than to work for an agency. I know people are looking at that and they’re trying to introduce that. They have also introduced some more relievers employed by the health department that would go back to the same community. The huge turnover rate doesn’t just impact on RANs. I mean, it’s hugely problematic and it creates a lot of stress on various people, but it also isn’t great for the community or the delivery of health services. So, strategies that will go towards a more stable workforce? The education and orientation – everybody needs an orientation before they go out and work in the remote community. That needs to include agency staff and that needs to be mandatory for everyone. The standard of education should be increased. To reduce the sense of isolation, I think it’s important that internet is provided in all the accommodation so that people can access professional development by the internet after hours, and they can also talk to friends or email family. It’s about reducing personal/professional isolation. I think in many communities there is also a need to employ more Indigenous health staff. That’s an ongoing option. As far as safety and on-call, the main thing is that there needs to be a second responder for every call-out. Most people in cities, with doctors and nurses, don’t go on call-outs on their own, and RANs were one of the last groups who still went out on their own at night on call. Now, it’s just not acceptable. That needs to be implemented across the board. ■ nursingreview.com.au | 11