November/December 2017 | Page 9

G ove r n men t Re lat ions PDA’s Legislative Goals The legislative session, which commenced in January 2017, allows PDA two years in which to advocate on members’ behalf for these important insurance reforms, and scope of practice and access to care initiatives: • Assignment of benefits • Health practitioner student loan forgiveness and tangential loan mitigation issues. • Increased funding in the Medical Assistance program for dental providers. While PDA takes a focused approach in limiting its primary advocacy efforts to these three issues, we will monitor and address these issues on an as-needed basis: • Maintaining funding for the Donated Dental Services program. • Prescription drug prescribing authority, abuse and patient monitoring. • Protecting the current dental team model and patients’ safety by limiting or restricting the unsupervised practice of non-dentists. • All other workforce and scope of practice issues. • Supporting programs and policies aimed at improving oral health. • Representing dentistry’s interests on issues pertaining to the Affordable Care Act. • All insurance issues, such as balance billing, coordination of benefits and credentialing. Assignment of Benefits At PDA’s request, Sen. John Eichelberger (R-Blair) and Rep. Stan Saylor (R-York) reintroduced assignment of benefits legislation in the Senate and House. SB 373 and HB 823 would require insurers to honor patients’ request to assign benefits directly to dentists, regardless of whether or not their dentist participates with the insurer. Payment from the insurer to the dentist may not exceed the amount that the insurer would otherwise have paid without the assignment of payment. Without assignment- of-benefits, patients are forced to pay for the full amount of the dental service upfront – which can be quite cost-prohibitive – or dentists risk performing a service without guarantee of payment. Assignment of benefits remedies this situation for all parties and thus improves access to care. PDA is aggressively lobbying for enactment of assignment of benefits legislation, having spent much of 2016 and the beginning of 2017 working with Senate and House leaders and staff on language that satisfied their concerns about adequate consumer protection safeguards in place when it comes to the issue of non-participating dentists accepting the assigned benefit and balance billing patients. The Senate Banking and Insurance Committee passed SB 373 in October. We are expecting the Senate to pass SB 373 before the end of the year and are hopeful that the House of Representatives will also pass the bill in early 2018. Telemedicine/Teledentistry Sen. Elder Vogel introduced SB 780 to address the emerging issue of telemedicine and other health care services, including dentistry. Telemedicine and teledentistry are the remote delivery of health care services and patients’ health information using telecommunications technology. Telemedicine and teledentistry is a significant and rapidly growing component of health care. Many believe that through the use of telemedicine and teledentistry, health care providers are able to expand their reach, helping rural patients stay in their communities and avoid traveling long distances for specialized care. SB 780 defines telemedicine, offers guidelines outlining who can provide telemedicine services, and provides clarity around insurance company reimbursement for these services. Although the legislation requires payments for telemedicine services, those payments will be established between the provider and insurer. SB 780 was assigned to the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee in June. PDA reviewed the legislation to ensure that it aligns with the ADA’s policy on teledentistry and communicated with Sen.Vogel’s staff in the fall to further refine the legislation. Balance Billing Reps. Tina Pickett and Matt Baker introduced HB 1553, legislation aimed at protecting patients from surprise balance bills from medical providers. Surprise balance billing occurs when a patient receives medical care from providers and at facilities they believe are in their health insurance plan’s network, but unknowingly receives services from an out-of-network provider. Surprise balance billing can also occur following an emergency, when a consumer has little or no control over where they are taken to receive care, and are often taken to an out-of-network emergency room. The Surprise Balance Bill Protection Act would: • Ensure that consumers are only responsible for their in-network cost-sharing obligations. N OVEM BER/DECEM BER 2017 | P EN N SYLVAN IA DEN TAL JOURNAL 7