12
NEW JERSEY COPS ■ JULY 2014
Courts rule that COLAs and Pension
Funding are contractual rights
Historically, June brings a flurry of activity
both in Trenton and the courts. This year was
no exception. A renewed interest arbitration
law, an important agency fee decision and
budget sparring have dominated headlines the
past several weeks. But, while all are important,
two recent decisions involving pensions for
public employees stand out and must be
addressed now.
NJ State PBA
Legal Corner
Robert A.
Last week, the New Jersey courts delivered
Fagella, Esq.
two significant – and favorable – decisions
involving pensions for law enforcement officers and all public employees generally. The
first involved the suspension of cost of living increases
(COLAs) for retirees enacted by Chapter 78. The second
involved the governor’s refusal to make the appropriate
pension contributions required by Chapter 78. In both
instances, the New Jersey State PBA brought lawsuits to
enforce these rights. More than a dozen other unions joined
us.
In CWA, State PBA, et al. v. Christie, the Appellate Division
addressed the lawsuit we filed last year, which contended
that the “suspension” of the COLAs contained in Chapter 78
violated the rights of both existing and future
retirees. The trial court had dismissed our
claims, concluding, in rather simplistic fashion, that the court did not have the authority
to compel funding by the legislature for retiree
benefits. We appealed, and the Appellate Division reversed.
In that appeal, the Attorney General’s position was that COLAs are discretionary and are
Paul L.
not part of the pension “benefits” system. In
Kleinbaum,
other words, COLA increments are not autoEsq.
matic under law, but must be specifically
enacted by the legislature each year. The
Appellate Division disagreed, holding, as we argued, that
COLAs are as much a part of the overall pension “benefit
system” provided to PFRS participants as the base benefit
itself. The court then held that a pension is a “contract”
between the state and employee – it is not a gift. The court
based this conclusion on a 1997 statute which provides a
“non-forfeitable right” to vested pensions, and COLAs are
an inextricable component of that right. Prior court decisions have refused to provide a specific characterization of
vested pensions as “contractual.” This is the first time a
Zazzali, Fagella, Nowak,
Kleinbaum & Friedman
Representing the New Jersey State PBA,
local PBAs, and law enforcement officers
for more than 40 years:
Contract negotiations and interest arbitration;
Contract grievances and grievance arbitration;
All disciplinary appeals and unfair practice charges;
Discrimination and whistleblower cases;
Disability pension appeals;
All aspects of State and Federal litigation;
State PBA Legal Protection Plan;
Practice before PERC, Civil Service Commission,
PFRS and other State agencies.
www.zazzali-law.com
[email protected]
Newark
One Riverfront Plaza
Suite 320
1037 Raymond Boulevard
Newark , NJ 07102
Tel: (973) 623-1822
Fax: (973) 623-2209
Trenton
150 West State Street
3rd Floor
Trenton, NJ 08608
Tel: (609) 392-8172
Fax: (609) 392-8933