NJ Cops Sept17 | Page 10

Proposed rule will limit pay for accumulated absences Once again, the Christie administration has taken steps to try to restrict the scope of negotiations and eliminate what is now a ne- gotiable term and condition of employment for public employees, including law enforce- ment officers. The Division of Local Govern- ment Services (LGS), within the Department of Community Affairs, has proposed a new rule which, if adopted, will restrict how pay for accumulated absences is calculated when a county or municipal employee separates from employment, usually through retire- ment. If the rule is adopted, it will affect most public employees who receive pay for accumulated or accrued leave when they leave employment, either at the time the rule proposal takes effect or after the expiration of a collective negotiations agree- ment in effect at the time the rule is adopted. The proposed rule currently is in the review and comment period, with comments due no later than Oct. 20. It is pub- lished in the New Jersey Register, 49 N.J.R. 2622(a). In addition to problems with the substance of the proposal, we believe that the proposal goes well beyond the scope of the existing rule 10 NEW JERSEY COPS ■ SEPTEMBER 2017 and, more importantly, beyond the scope of the authority of LGS to propose the rule. Our firm is submitting comments opposing this proposal on behalf of the NJ State PBA. The rule proposal seeks to amend N.J.A.C. 5:30-15.4. It applies to municipalities and counties and would apply to “sick days, vaca- tion days, personal days, compensatory time or other absence time authorized as part of an employer agreement, which is not used by the employee during the allowed period, and which is permitted to accumulate over time to the benefit of the employee.” N.J.A.C. 5:30-15.2. Right now, if an employee receives pay for accumu- lated days upon separation from employment, that employee can be paid for accrued time based on the rate of pay either at the time the days are accumulated or at the rate of pay at the time of separation. It is a negotiable subject which might be in the collective negotiations agreement. For employees who have this benefit, any accumulated days are often paid based on the rate of pay at the time of separation. The rule proposal does not impose a cap on the amount of the payout. Any existing caps