NJ Cops Nov18 | Page 13

the fourth year of contributions was completed on June 30, 2014. PERC disagreed and held that the prior contractual pro- vision would not automatically be reinstated once the fourth year of Chapter 78 contributions was completed. Instead, PERC concluded that the employee contributions must continue at the maximum level in effect at the completion of the fourth year unless, and until, the parties negotiated a lower contribution rate. PERC did not leave it at that and concluded that employees would be required to continue to pay the maximum percentage until the expiration of the next agreement if the parties negoti- ated a multi-year contract after the existing agreement expired on June 30, 2014. In other words, the parties could not negoti- ate a lower contribution rate while the successor agreement was in effect because the fourth year of contributions would not be completed until June 30, 2015. PERC further noted that if the parties agreed to a one-year contract, which would then expire on June 30, 2015, they could then negotiate another agreement that could include a lower contribution level because only then would the fourth year of contributions have been completed. The education association appealed the decision. However, the parties settled their dispute before the appeal was heard. To resolve the dispute, the parties took PERC’s suggestion and agreed to a one-year contract during which employees would pay the maximum contribution rate for the fourth year of con- tributions. At the same time, the parties also negotiated a three- year agreement to take effect on July 1, 2015 and dropped the contribution levels by 25 percent or to Tier 3 levels. Because of this settlement, the Appellate Division dismissed the appeal as moot. The Clementon decision is the current state of the law in New Jersey. However, there is another appeal in the Appellate Divi- sion involving the Ridgefield Park Board of Education in which the same issues have been raised. We do not expect a decision until sometime next year. Considering this background, what is the status of Locals’ ability to negotiate lower contribution levels? If you have com- pleted four full years of contributions and your contract has expired or will expire, Locals have the right to negotiate lower contribution levels. Like the agreement in the Clementon case, many PBA agreements have better language on contributions that pre-date Chapter 78. However, this language, which may have established lower contribution levels, will not automati- cally be reinstated once the Chapter 78 obligation has been completed. Contributions will remain at the maximum level unless, and until, the PBA negotiates lower rates. During ne- gotiations, Locals should work with their attorneys to develop proposals and strategies that may or may not involve the same language pre-Chapter 78. If your existing contract has not yet expired – and you will not complete the fourth year of Chapter 78 contributions until af- ter the expiration of an existing contract – you may not be able to negotiate for lower contribution rates unless you follow the example of the parties in the Clementon case. In other words, a Local could negotiate a short-term contract during which the maximum level of contributions under Chapter 78 will be com- pleted and then negotiate a multi-year contract with lower con- tribution rates. As we noted earlier, there are PBA Locals, as well as other unions, which have negotiated lower contribution rates. There are a number of ways that lower contribution rates can be ne- gotiated. The Local could negotiate for a percentage of pen- sionable salary no less than 1.5 percent. Or the Local could ne- gotiate for a reduction in the percentage based upon the cost of coverage. This could be accomplished either by a reduced percentage or reducing the contribution to a lower tier on the Chapter 78 scale, i.e., to Tier 3, as was done in Clementon. In the first two examples, contributions could increase each year if either salaries or cost of coverage increase. Additionally, the Local could base the contribution using a fixed cost of coverage that would not increase from year to year using Chapter 78 con- tributions (or some other rate), for example, based on 2015 pre- mium costs. An advantage in basing it on a fixed premium cost is that the premium will not increase from year, to year even if the percentage remained at the highest level of 35 percent. Based on our experience in representing many PBA Locals, and with the information that has been provided to the State PBA Labor Relations Consultant, few PBAs have been success- ful in negotiating lower contribution levels. It would be an un- derstatement to say that employers will not easily agree to a reduction in what has amounted to a windfall for them during the past eight years. In most cases where reductions have been negotiated, those reductions have not come without a price. Be prepared for employers to propose reductions in other benefits if they have any interest in negotiating reductions in health in- surance contributions. These are issues that PBA Locals should discuss with their attorneys when they are ready and able to negotiate for lower contribution levels. There are many factors that must be consid- ered when deciding if and how to present a proposal for lower contribution levels. It is not a one-size-fits-all proposition. We will continue to keep the State PBA and its members apprised of any developments that affect this issue, which is of great im- portance to members and their families. www.njcopsmagazine.com ■ NOVEMBER 2018 13